Studying the behavior of 3-year-old children can predict their criminality – IELTS Writing Task 2
Updated On
IELTS Writing Task 2 Topic:
Some scientists believe that studying the behavior of 3-year-old children can predict their criminality. To what extent do you think a crime is a product of human nature, or is it possible to stop children from growing up to be criminals?
OR
Many researchers believe that we can now study the behaviour of children to see if they will grow up to be criminals, while others disagree. To what extent do you think crime is determined by genetics? Is it possible to stop children from growing up to be criminals?
Sample Essay
There is a multitude of people who subscribe to the notion that by observing the behaviours of young children, we can predict their likelihood of becoming criminals in the future. However, it is believed that other external factors can also heavily influence children’s development and their mannerisms in adulthood.
IELTS Writing (General) Actual Tests eBook Combo (May - August 2022) [Task 1+ Task 2]
4.8 of 89 Reviews
Written by professional IELTS teachers to help candidates on the big day
Written by professional IELTS teachers to help candidates on the big day
Through various researches, scientists found that delinquents, in fact, share some personal traits in their childhood that can help foretell their criminality. Generally, these individuals were more aggressive and impulsive than their peers when they were kids. For these reasons, it is understandable why some people contend that learning about how one behaves as a child can help foresee their chance of committing crimes as an adult.
IELTS Actual Test Questions (May - August 2022)
4.8 of 5
4.6 of 5
4.8 of 5
4.8 of 5
Nevertheless, compared to other extrinsic elements, such as upbringing and schooling, genetic characteristics appear to be less influential on children’s behaviours. It is no surprise that children who are raised in a healthy and educational environment often grow to be ethical citizens. On the contrary, most convicts have some extent of tragedy in their childhoods, such as parental divorce and family breakdown. Without their parents’ guidance and sufficient attention, kids lack the ability to judge right and wrong, a skill that is vital in a moral society. For that reason, it is necessary that adults need to monitor and control youngsters’ behaviours and undertake/take/implement any corrective measure when it is needed.
In the light of the aforementioned discussion, there is no point arguing whether there is a nexus between one’s genes and their behavioural patterns. However, it is strongly supported that when children receive good care and ethical education, it is unlikely that they will commit any unlawful activities in the future.
Sample Essay:
Some scientists are of the opinion that hereditary characteristics are responsible for the person’s temperament and hence future career. I disagree with this notion. I believe genes do play a role, but the primary determinant is nurture – education and bringing up. It is definitely possible to mould a child into any direction by proper bringing-up.
If we adopt the mindset that if parents are criminals then so will the children be, we are limiting or even damaging the individual’s basic right to achieve his very best. Children can rise above the gene pool and rise to great heights. Even if a child is born to criminal parents but brought up away from that environment and provided quality education, he will not be a criminal.
The debate on nature versus nurture has been raging for ages, and no clear cut answer has come forward. A child prodigy can be born to ordinary parents, and many intelligent parents can have ordinary children. A talented person can go unnoticed in the absence of the right environment and upbringing, and an ordinary person can reach great heights with proper training. So the interplay between hereditary and environmental factors must be there.
It has been seen that children born to intelligent parents also are intelligent and successful. But it is also possible that such parents provide an environment which nurtures the development of their children. When we see some programmes such as ‘India’s Got Talent’ and ‘Little Champs’, we notice some extremely gifted children who are born with talent and also some who have achieved great heights with great perseverance and proper coaching.
To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that both nature and nurture play a part in determining the character of a person. It can also be concluded that both are inextricably linked with each other. But nurture weighs over nature, and it is definitely possible to prevent children from growing up to be criminals.
Also check :
Practice IELTS Writing Task 2 based on Essay types
Explore other Writing Actual Tests
Courtney Miller
Post your Comments
2 Comments
Sneha
Posted on Nov 14, 2021
Q- Many researchers believe that we can now study the behaviour of children to see if they will grow up to be criminals, while others disagree. To what extent do you think crime is determined by genetics? Is it possible to stop children from growing up to be criminals?
While it is believed by a few researchers that studying children’s behaviour helps to predict whether or not they will commit crimes when they grow up, some do not agree with this viewpoint. In my opinion, the causation of crime is not related to innate genes and DNA, but rather extrinsic attributions, namely poverty and the environment. Many steps can be taken to deter children from turning into offenders in their adult lives.
For one thing, we should remember that genetics does not compel people to offend. If this were the case, every miscreant’s children would inherit the skills of criminality. I think the primary reason people commit crimes is the situation in which they live. Historically, people from poverty-stricken areas are more prone to committing crimes because they do not have legitimate jobs that enable financial stability. Another major reason is the surroundings. People residing in areas where crimes take place on a daily basis seem to make them fearless towards the law. They feel the act of perpetration is justified and normal since everyone around them is involved in some or many kinds of law-breaking activities. By getting influence from such criminals, people participate in breaking laws.
Children can be molded into law-abiding citizens as they are still at an impressionable age. The first measure ought to be taken by the government to ensure that every child is provided with a free and quality education, irrespective of their family background. This will ensure that they become erudite adults and have job security, so they can rise from poverty. Having a proper job to meet the necessities of life will act as a deterrent to crime. Secondly, children whose parents have criminal records should be under social service supervision. Having a regular check-up will help to keep tabs on them so they do not go astray, resulting in children growing up in a safe and protected environment where no one can force them to follow the path of their parents. The more government assistance there is, the safer the young can be raised.
In conclusion, the main causes of crime are destitute conditions and an abysmal environment instead of inherit charactertistics. However, counter-measures such as education and surveillance of children will possibly ensure that they are safe and do not grow up to be criminals. In my view, the government plays a major role in tackling this problem of delinquencies.
Reply
Janice Thompson
Posted on Nov 18, 2021
Band score: 5.5
Concentrate on verb forms, articles and spellings.
Sentence structure needs to be taken care:
“People residing in areas where crimes take place on a daily basis seem to make them fearless towards the law.”
could be rephrased as ” People residing in areas where crimes take place on a daily basis seem to be fearless of the law”