IELTS Writing Practice Test 29 Task 1 and Sample Answers

The table illustrates the proportion of land area coverage by forest in Australia, Brazil, Chile and New Zealand in 1990 and 2005 as well as projected figures for 2015. The units are messured in percentage.
Overall, the countries, Australia and Brazil saw a downward trend in the area covered by forest between year 1990 and 2005. In addition, the same fall is estimated in the following year 2015. However, other two countries, Chile and New Zealand experienced an upsurge in the green cover area and are expected to follow the similar trend in 2015 as well.
Australia’s figure drop from 21.9% to 21.3% in 2005 while there was a drop from 62.2% to 57.2% in 2005. On the contrary, New Zealand and Chile managed to improve the score from 28.8% to 31.0% and 20.4% to 21.5% in 2005 respectively. It is projected to further increase in 2015.
All in all, land area covered by forest is expected to soar for New Zealand and Chile and slide for Brazil and Australia in coming years.

Reply

The given table provides us with data pertaining to the percentage of forest land covered in four different countries over the years 1990 and 2005, including estimated figures for 2015.

From the table, it is very conspicuous that the forest cover in Australia and Brazil decreased from 21.90 and 62.20 in 1990 to 21.03 and 57.20 in 2005 and the same trend was projected to be continued in 2015 with further dipping in their respective green cover i.e., 20.00 and 53.50.

Whereas, on the other hand, the countries, New Zealand and Chile, managed to improve their percentage share of forest land vis-à-vis their total territory from 28.80 and 20.40 in 1990 to 31.00 and 21.50 in 2005, and they were expected to further improve their green pasture in 2015 to 32.30 and 22.00.

Overall, the percentage of forest land vis-à-vis the total land of New Zealand and Chile was going northwards, and for Australia and Brazil, it was going southwards.

Reply

The given table provides us with data pertaining to the percentage of forest land covered in four different countries over the years 1990 and 2005, including an estimated figure for 2015.

From the table, it is very conspicuous that the forest cover in Australia and Brazil decreased from 21.90 , 62.20 in 1990 to 21.03 , 57.20 in 2005, and the same trend was projected to be continued in 2015 with further dipping in their respective green cover, i.e., 20.00 and 53.50.

Whereas, on the other hand, New Zealand and Chile managed to improve their percentage share of forest land vis-à-vis total territory from 28.80 and 20.40 in 1990 to 31.00 and 21.50 in 2005, and they were expected to further improve their green pasture in 2015 to 32.30 and 22.00.

Overall, the percentage of forest land vis-à-vis the total land of New Zealand and Chile was going north, and for Australia and Brazil, it was going southwards.

Reply

The table depicts information on the changes in the forest area of four countries (New Zealand, Brazil, Australia and Chile) in 1990, 2005 and 2015. The units were expressed in percentage.
Overall, Brazil and Australia were found with a considerable drop in the land covered by forest while, New Zealand and Chile had a markedly rise throughout the period in 1990, 2005 and 2015.
In 1990, Brazil had the largest land area under forest that accounts for 62.2%, which dwindled drastically over 25 years and reached about 53.5%. Likewise, Australia which was the second last in the list of forest area in 1990, moved to the least forest area cover by 2015 with a decrease of 1.9%.
In contrast, New Zealand and Chile strengthened with a marginal increase in their forest cover by 3.5% and 1.6% by the year 2015. By enhancing the forest area, Chile reduced the burden of being last in the list by 2015.

Reply

The table below depicts the data in percentage of land that is covered by forest in Australia, New Zealand ,Brazil and Chile, in 1990 and 2005 with estimated figures for 2015.
Overall New Zealand and Chile had a rise in land covered by forest by 2015 whereas Australia and Brazil had a decrease the same year. Brazil had the largest land covered in forest compared to other countries.
Australia had 21,9% in 1990 , it slightly decreased to 21,3% in 2005 and it was estimated to decline to a 20 % in 2015.In 1990,New Zealand had 28.8% which then gradually increased over the years to 31 % in 2005 and 32,3% in 2015.Regardless of having the most land covered in forest Brazil experienced a sharp fall in percentage of land covered by forest from 62,2% in 1990 to 57,2 %in 2005 and 53,5% in 2015.Chile had the least land covered in forest and it experienced a rise in 2005 and 2015 from 20.4 % in 1990 to 21,5% in 2005 and 22% in 2015.

Reply

The given table describes the comparison, of the surface area of land covered by forests, among some countries in the years 1990, 2005, and 2015.
Keeping the given table in view we can see that the forest area of Australia has decreased gradually over the years, such as; 21.9% in 1990, 21.3% in 2005, and 20.0% in 2015. Whereas, it seems that the forestland of New Zealand and Chile has grown from time to time is estimated at 28.8% in 1990, 31.0% in 2005, and 32.3% in 2015 whereas, 20.4% in 1990, 21.5% in 2005, and 22.0% in 2015 respectively. Brazil has the largest area of forestland among all other countries mentioned, starting from 62.2% in 1990, and reducing to 53.5% in 2015.
Overall, New Zealand and Chile’s forest area has expanded over time whereas, on the other hand, the surface area of land of Australia and Brazil covered by forest has reduced gradually in the mentioned years and these trends are expected to continue in the future.

Reply

The table makes an analogy between different countries to show data related to the woodlands area for the years 1990, 2005, and a prediction of future conditions in 2015.
At the first glance, what is interpretable from this table, Brazil is ranked at the top of them with most percentage, and Australia is at a rock-bottom percentage of land covered by forest. As time goes by, this percentage in Australia and Brazil decreases, while a reverse behavior is visible in Chile and New Zealand.
As illustrated by the table, Australia experienced a slight fall in the area of forests. The percentage of land covered by forest in 1990 was about 21.9%. Then, with a drop of 0.6%, it reached down to 21.3% in 2005, and finally, this amount for the year 2015 about 20 percent is being estimated. Brazil witnessed similar behavior. Regarding the table, 62.2, 57.2, and 53.5 percent for the years 1990, 2005, and 2015 are being assessed, respectively.
By contrast, New Zealand and Chile are showing growth in the area of forests. There was a negligible rise in Chile from 20.4% in 1990 to 22% in 2015. Similarly, for the year 1990 in New Zealand 28.8%, 31 percent in 2005, and Just over 32% is being estimated for the year 2015.

Reply

The given tables show the percentage of land covered by Forest in different countries between the years 1990 to 2005, and the assumed percentage of the Forest will be inclined and decline by the year 2015.

In the table, if we observe, the country New Zealand covered 28.8 per cent in 1990s and increased to 2.2% percentage in the year 2005 by covering a percentage of 31 as well as it showing the prediction percentage 1.3 will be increased by the year 2015 with the coverage of 32.3 percentage.
In the same way, Chile covered 20.4 per cent in 1990 and increased to 21.5 per cent in 2005 and showing the Forest will cover a forest inclination of 22.00 per cent of the land in 2015.
The above two countries, New Zealand and Chile show the positive result for the inclination of Forest.

However, countries like Australia and Brazil show that deforestation increased between the years 1990 to 2005 and predicted it would go to more deforestation by 2015.

In 1990, 21.9 per cent of the land was covered by the Forest and declined to 21.3 per cent in the year 2005, the result of 0.6 per cent of deforestation happened in Australia. It showed 1.3 Percentage Is going to be deforestation by 2015.

Accordingly, in Brazil in the year 1990, 62.00 per cent of land covered by the Forest and which is drastically fell to 57.2 per cent by 2005 and assuming it goes to 53.5 per cent by 2015. Tables refer to in this country; Deforestation is at a high level.

Reply

I hope to get a reply to my writing, to aid me to upgrade my skills. Thank you.
The table explains the proportion of land made of forests in different countries in 1990 and 2005 with projected figures for 2015.
Two countries showed an increase in forested land, including New Zealand at 28.8% in 1990, climbing to 31% in 2005 and will increase to 32.3% in 2015. Likewise, the proportion of Chile’s at 20.4% in 1990, inclined to 21.5% in 2005 and is predicted to rise to 22.5% in 2015.
However, there was a decline in the land space covered up with forests in Australia and Brazil. Australia’s figure in 1990 was at 21.9%, which reduced to 21.3% in 2005 and is projected to drop further to 20% in 2015. Brazil had a fall from 62.2% in 1990 to 57.2%in 2005 and is expected to continually decrease to 53.5% in 2015.
Overall, it is observed that New Zealand and Chile had an increase in forested lands, unlike Australia and brazil, whose land space was covered with forests reduced over time and are all going to follow this trend.

Reply

I hope my report writing would be evaluated so that, I would know my place in writing skills.
The tabular chart provided details on the proportion of the land occupied by the forests in different countries in terms of percentage in the year 1990 and 2005 along with the data of percentage of the forest areas to be found in 2015 were given.
Overall, a substantial decline in the maintaining the forest area was found in Australia and Brazil whereas, a steady rise in the rate of forest land covering the land masses was in countries like New Zealand and Chile over the years 1990 and 2005. The estimates of the the year 2015 on these forest areas exhibited decreasing and increasing patterns respectively.
At first, a marginal dip was found in Australia from a rate of 21.9% to 21.3% in the year 1990 and 2005. A further estimate in the forest land masses was also found to have the impact in 2015 which accounted 20% precisely. A significant downfall in forest land was observed in Brazil with values 62.2%, 57.2% and 53.2% in the respective years 1990, 2005 and 2015.
However, an increasing trend was seen in New Zealand from 1990, 2005 with an increment of 2.2% in it’s existing forest areas. The future rate in growing forest was found to be promising as well with a percentage of 32.3% in 2015. Furthermore, a similar growth pattern was shown in the area of land masses covered by forest in Chile from 1990 to 2015 with values such as 20.4%, 21.5% and 22% in the respective years.

Reply