Do You Believe that Experimentation on Animals - IELTS Writing Task 2
7 min read
Updated On
-
Copy link
Examine sample answers for the IELTS Writing Task 2 direct question essay ‘Do You Believe that Experimentation on Animals’. Also, take the time to examine the comprehensive outline & relevant vocabulary to write an essay that will score Band 7 or higher.
Table of Contents
Try AI Essay Checker for Instant Band Score
Animal experimentation sits at the centre of an ethical debate, forcing societies to weigh scientific progress against moral responsibility and the rights of non-human life. The IELTS essay ‘Do You Believe that Experimentation on Animals’ discusses this controversy that continues to divide scientists, policymakers, and the public.
So, in this blog, we examine sample answers for the IELTS Writing Task 2 essay on the topic ‘Do You Believe that Experimentation on Animals’, along with an outline and relevant vocabulary, which is crucial for achieving a high band score.
Essay Question for ‘Do You Believe that Experimentation on Animals’
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Do you believe that experimentation on animals for scientific purposes is justified? Are there any alternatives to animal experiments? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words.
Outline for IELTS Direct Question Essay
Given below is the outline that will help you to understand how to write IELTS direct question essays, like ‘Do you believe that experimentation on animals’.
|
Introduction
Body Paragraphs
Conclusion
|
Sample Answers for Do You Believe that Experimentation on Animals IELTS Writing Task 2
Here are three IELTS Band 9 essay samples on the topic ‘Do you believe that experimentation on animals’, that will help you to achieve your desired writing band score.
Do You Believe that Experimentation on Animals - Sample Answer 1
Medical science has improved tremendously over the last few decades. Most of the medicines available in the market have been tested on animals. Once satisfactory results have been received, those medicines are approved for human use. Regardless, many people question the need to torture animals in the name of medical needs.
To begin with, testing on animals for scientific purposes has been adopted for many years, so there must undoubtedly be a few advantages. Firstly, human life is significant, so trying medicines directly on humans would not be wise. Experimenting on animals is a proven technique. Moreover, science has discovered that the human body is similar to animals and this method is a lot cheaper and more effective in terms of results than a computer simulation. Take anaesthesia as an example. It is used to make animals unconscious and it works similarly on humans.
Science has progressed in all directions. So, we have a few alternatives that should be encouraged to alternate animal experimentation. One of them is to use more natural products. If the demand for the chemical product is reduced, such experiments would be reduced. For instance, many cosmetic companies are selling natural beauty products, clearly mentioned that “Not tried on animals”. If people surge up the use of such products, other cosmetic companies will also try to sell natural products. Likewise, if we can develop medicines to reduce human pain, we should also create medicines to minimise animals’ pain during experiments.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that testing on animals violates the lives of wild animals. Yet, if governments and animal rights supporters work together, animal conservation is more likely to be achieved.
Join our IELTS online classes and discuss your writing queries with the best experts!
Do You Believe that Experimentation on Animals - Sample Answer 2
The practice of using animals in laboratories for medical and scientific research has long been a subject of ethical scrutiny. While proponents argue that such experiments are vital for medical advancement, critics question whether it is acceptable to inflict suffering on living beings in the name of human progress. This essay will explore the rationale behind animal testing and critically examine the growing demand for humane alternatives that eliminate cruelty.
To begin with, animal experimentation is commonly conducted to test new drugs, vaccines, and surgical procedures before they are approved for human use. Scientists claim that animals share biological similarities with humans, making them suitable test subjects for predicting side effects and treatment outcomes. For instance, rodents are frequently used in cancer and neurological research to assess toxicity levels. However, this process often involves invasive procedures, prolonged confinement, and eventual euthanasia, raising serious moral concerns. Many argue that such practices amount to systematic exploitation, especially when animals cannot consent or defend themselves.
Fortunately, rapid technological progress has introduced viable alternatives that reduce or completely replace animal testing. Methods such as computer simulations, in-vitro testing, and organ-on-chip technology can replicate human biological responses with greater accuracy. These innovations not only minimise ethical dilemmas but also offer cost-effective and time-efficient solutions. Moreover, human cell cultures provide results that are often more clinically relevant than animal models, making them a promising substitute for traditional testing.
In conclusion, while animal experimentation has historically contributed to scientific breakthroughs, its continued use is increasingly difficult to justify in light of ethical objections and advanced alternatives. In my view, prioritising non-animal methodologies is both morally responsible and scientifically sound.
Book a FREE Demo to learn tips and writing techniques from experts!
Do You Believe that Experimentation on Animals - Sample Answer 3
Scientific experimentation on animals has been widely employed to support medical discoveries and pharmaceutical development. Despite its perceived benefits, the practice has sparked intense debate regarding the moral legitimacy of causing pain to animals for human gain. This essay will examine why animal testing is still practised and question whether subjecting animals to cruel treatment is necessary when alternative methods exist.
Animal testing is primarily used to evaluate the safety and efficacy of medical treatments before human trials. Supporters argue that it helps prevent unforeseen risks and protects public health. Animals such as monkeys and rabbits are often exposed to hazardous substances or surgical trials to observe physiological reactions. Nevertheless, these experiments frequently lead to distress and physical harm, prompting critics to label them as ethically indefensible, particularly when results cannot be directly extrapolated to humans.
In contrast, modern science offers several innovative alternatives that eliminate the need for animal suffering. Advanced techniques like 3D tissue engineering, artificial intelligence-based modelling, and micro-dosing in humans allow researchers to gather accurate data without ethical compromise. These approaches are increasingly recognised by regulatory bodies and can significantly reduce both failure rates and research costs. As a result, they present a more sustainable and compassionate path forward.
To conclude, although animal experimentation has played a role in medical history, its justification is weakening due to ethical concerns and scientific limitations. I firmly believe that investing in animal-free research methods is the most responsible way to balance medical progress with compassion.
Vocabulary to Use for Do You Believe that Experimentation on Animals - IELTS Writing Task 2
The following are some useful vocabulary for IELTS essay related to the topic, ‘Do you believe that experimentation on animals’, that have been used in the above sample answers.
|
Word |
Meaning |
Example Sentence |
|---|---|---|
|
Tremendously |
to a very great extent; extremely |
A number of creative exercises enhanced student interest and involvement tremendously. |
|
Unconscious |
not awake or aware of one’s surroundings |
He was found unconscious after fainting from exhaustion during the hike. |
|
Cosmetic |
related to improving appearance rather than function |
The renovation was mostly cosmetic, with little change to the building’s structure. |
|
Surge |
a sudden and strong increase or movement |
There was a surge in online orders during the holiday sale. |
|
Minimise |
to reduce something to the smallest possible amount |
The manager tried to minimise confusion by issuing clear instructions. |
|
Violates |
breaks or fails to follow a rule, law, or agreement |
Sharing confidential files violates company policy. |
|
Scrutiny |
careful and detailed examination |
The financial report came under intense scrutiny from auditors. |
|
Inflict |
to cause something unpleasant or harmful to be suffered |
His careless remark inflicted embarrassment on his colleague. |
|
Rationale |
the underlying reason or explanation for a decision or belief |
The professor explained the rationale behind the grading system. |
|
Invasive |
involving entry into the body or personal space; intrusive |
The interview questions felt overly invasive and uncomfortable. |
|
Euthanasia |
the act of intentionally ending life to relieve pain or suffering |
The novel explores the ethical debate surrounding euthanasia in fictional societies. |
|
Viable |
capable of working successfully; practical and effective |
The proposal seemed innovative but not viable within the given budget. |
|
Legitimacy |
the quality of being lawful, acceptable, or justified |
The court questioned the legitimacy of the contract. |
|
Efficacy |
the ability to produce a desired or intended result |
Researchers tested the efficacy of the new training programme. |
|
Indefensible |
impossible to justify or excuse |
His decision to ignore safety warnings was indefensible. |
|
Extrapolated |
estimated or inferred based on known data |
The scientist extrapolated future trends from existing statistics. |
|
Micro-dosing |
the practice of taking very small quantities of a substance |
Some artists claim micro-dosing improves creativity, though evidence is limited. |
In conclusion, IELTS essays on animal experimentation require a careful balance between ethical reasoning and scientific logic. You have to evaluate both sides objectively and suggest regulated solutions with relevant examples and IELTS vocabulary that are more likely to achieve Band 7 and above. So, consistently practicing IELTS Writing practice tests can improve your writing skills and help you achieve your desired writing band score.
Useful Links:
- Examine the Arguments in Favour Of and Against Animal Experiments - IELTS Writing Task 2
- It is No Longer Necessary to Use Animals for Food, Clothing or Medical Research - IELTS Writing Task 2
- Nowadays Animal Experiments are Widely Used to Develop New Medicines - IELTS Writing Task 2
- Some People say that Animals Can be Used in any Way for the Benefit of Humans- IELTS Writing Task 2
- Money is Important in Most People's Lives - IELTS Writing Task 2
- Some TV Programs and Video of Violent Games are Harmful for Children - IELTS Writing Task 2
- Deleting Words in IELTS Writing
Practice IELTS Writing Task 2 based on Essay types
Start Preparing for IELTS: Get Your 10-Day Study Plan Today!
Explore other Direct Question Essays
Recent Articles
Haniya Yashfeen
Prity Mallick
Kasturika Samanta
Post your Comments