Some People Prefer To Directly Help Or Support People Who Need It In The Local Community - IELTS Writing Task 2

This blog focuses on a Discussion Essay, a type of IELTS Writing Task 2 essay where candidates are required to examine both sides of an argument and then give their own opinion. To help you boost your IELTS Writing score, this blog provides three sample Band 9 essays, enriched with advanced vocabulary and phrases commonly used in high-scoring responses. By studying these examples, you can learn how to structure your essay, present arguments effectively, and use Band 9-level lexical resources to impress examiners.

Question

Outline

Essay Type

• Discussion Essay

Introduction

• Paraphrase the topic sentence.
• Clearly state the contents of the essay.

Body

• Paragraph 1 – There are clear justifications for why some funders would rather help the poor by themselves. First of all, help is given instantly as there is no paperwork, no collection, no delivery involved.
• Paragraph 2 – The idea of giving cash directly to the poor is also treated with skepticism by many people who otherwise suggest that money or any other type of donation should be given to charity organisations. Their main argument is that for the people whose lives have always been devoid of material possessions or money, knowing how to manage the financial aids is out of the question.

Conclusion

• Conclude the essay by summarizing the topic and mention the final view in the end.

Some People Prefer To Directly Help Or Support People Who Need It In The Local Community - Sample Answer 1

Today poverty is still on full display anywhere in the world, even from the sparkling and vibrant streets of Los Angeles or to the less glamorous district of Mumbai city. In the fight against poverty, help is at hand. However, a bone of contention remains whether people should directly support the underprivileged or donate to charities. This essay will look at this issue from both perspectives.

There are clear justifications for why some funders would rather help the poor by themselves. First of all, help is given instantly as there is no paperwork, no collection, no delivery involved. It would also mean that no money is lost into the pockets of corrupt government officials. Second of all, it has been found that a considerable number of recipients of aid programs spend money on children’s education or healthcare, rather than alcohol or cigarettes. Therefore, development can be easily promoted.

However, the idea of giving cash directly to the poor is also treated with skepticism by many people who otherwise suggest that money or any other type of donation should be given to charity organisations. Their main argument is that for the people whose lives have always been devoid of material possessions or money, knowing how to manage the financial aids is out of the question. There are many cases where poor people use the money to start businesses; however, bankruptcy is imminent due to their lack of knowledge regarding financial management. For this reason, charities, which can distribute the funds more effectively, prove their prominent roles in improving the living standards of the impoverished.

To conclude, I am inclined to think that giving money to charities is a better way to end poverty as it deals with deeper causes of the issue in the long run.

Some People Prefer To Directly Help Or Support People Who Need It In The Local Community - Sample Answer 2

The soaring levels of poverty around the globe are a matter of grave concern. The pitiful circumstances that the underprivileged have to endure, are distressing, to say the least. However, in the recent past, welfare ventures and campaigns have seen a notable rise in third world countries. That being said, the debate on the efficacy of charitable organizations and whether providing aid to the destitute personally is more sensible or not has been a subject of discussion. In my opinion, philanthropic endeavours are more impactful when personal attention is present. In the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on both sides of the discussion and justify my views on the same.

To begin with, the prime advantage of aiding the poor on your own accord is the degree of autonomy and control that an individual has when undertaking such actions. For instance, during the festive season in India, the practice of the distribution of clothing among the needy is a typical practice and several households are known to follow such customs making sure to help as many as possible. Similarly, a wealthy individual can pursue such activities in their locality and directly see to the upliftment of the entire community.

However, the inherent limitation of such an approach is that the people, especially well-to-do individuals are often preoccupied with their affairs and in many cases unbothered by the plight of the impoverished. On that account, the efforts of NGOs and humanitarian establishments are far more effective as the sole purpose of their existence is to assist the needful. Thus, patronage and donations to such corporations can be seen as worthwhile contributions to tackle poverty.

In conclusion, I would like to mention that supporting the poverty-stricken is a responsibility everyone should take on to the best of their capabilities regardless of the approach. Nonetheless, I firmly believe in the notion that charity begins at home and should be a personal enterprise.

Some People Prefer To Directly Help Or Support People Who Need It In The Local Community - Sample Answer 3

Poverty remains a persistent problem worldwide, and people differ in their opinions on how best to help those in need. While some argue that personally assisting individuals in the local community is most effective, others believe that donating to charities, whether national or international, provides a more sustainable solution. This essay will discuss both perspectives before presenting my own view.

Direct support allows immediate and tangible aid. Individuals can ensure that their contributions, such as food, clothing, or small amounts of money, reach the intended recipients without administrative delays or corruption. For example, during festivals in many countries, families often distribute essentials directly to underprivileged households, ensuring transparency and timely assistance. Moreover, direct involvement provides donors with a sense of personal satisfaction and connection.

However, donating to established charities has significant advantages. Many recipients lack financial literacy, and direct cash may be spent inefficiently. Charities possess the expertise and infrastructure to address both urgent needs and long-term development, including education, healthcare, and skill-building programs. Additionally, pooled resources allow charities to implement large-scale initiatives that individual donors cannot achieve.

In my opinion, while direct help has its merits for immediate relief, supporting reputable charities is ultimately more effective in creating lasting change. Combining personal effort with organized charitable contributions can maximize the impact on poverty reduction.

Some People Prefer To Directly Help Or Support People Who Need It In The Local Community - IELTS Vocabulary

The following are some of the IELTS Vocabulary found in the "Some People Prefer To Directly Help Or Support People Who Need It In The Local Community - IELTS Writing Task 2."

• Underprivileged – people who do not have basic needs like food, money, or education.
  Example: Schools help underprivileged children in poor areas.

• Bone of contention – something people disagree about.
  Example: The school funding has become a bone of contention among parents.

• Skepticism – doubt or not fully believing something.
  Example: Many people have skepticism about whether charity money is used properly.

• Devoid of – completely without something.
  Example: Some villages are devoid of clean water.

• Recipient – a person who receives something.
  Example: The scholarship recipients were very happy.

• Imminent – about to happen soon, usually something bad.
  Example: Bankruptcy was imminent for the small shop.

• Financial management – planning and controlling money.
  Example: Good financial management helps businesses succeed.

• Corrupt – dishonest or doing illegal things for money or power.
  Example: Some people avoid government help because officials are corrupt.

• Prominent role – an important part or position.
  Example: Charities play a prominent role in helping poor people.

• In the long run – over a long time or in the future.
  Example: Studying hard now will help you in the long run.

In summary, this blog has provided a discussion essay on whether direct community support or donating to charities is more effective in helping the needy. With three Band 9 sample essays and carefully selected high-level vocabulary, you can understand how to present balanced arguments, express your opinion clearly, and elevate your lexical resource. Practising with these examples will strengthen your writing skills and increase your chances of achieving a higher band score in the IELTS Writing Task 2.

More Writing Task 2 Essay Topics

• Do You Think Students Need to Wear School Uniforms
• Some People Think That it is More Important to Plant Tree in Open Areas
• People's Shopping Habits Depend More On The Age Group That They Belong to Then Other Factors
• University Education Should be Free for all Students
• Music is a Good Way of Bringing People of Different Cultures and Ages Together
• Crime Rate Nowadays is Decreasing Compared to the Past Due to Advances in Technology