IELTS Writing Practice Test 36 (Task 1 & 2) & Sample Answers
IELTS Writing Topic:
WRITING TASK 1
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The table below gives information about past and projected population figures in various countries for different years. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
WRITING TASK 2
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic:
Some individuals feel that working from home, while of benefit to employees, is a drawback for employers.
To what extent do you agree or disagree? OR
Some individuals feel that working from home, while of benefit to employees, is actually a drawback for employers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
Task 1 Model Answer
The table shows population figures for four countries from 1990 to 2000 and projected growth for 2020 and 2050.
The country with the lowest population and the lowest projected growth rate in New Zealand with 3.4m in 1990, rising to 3.8m in 2000 and expected to increase to 4.7m in 2050. The United States has a similar growth rate but a much larger population, starting at 249.9m in 1990, reaching 275.1m in 2000 and anticipated to increase by almost 100m over the 60-year period.
IELTS Actual Tests Questions (January - April 2021) with Answers
Canada’s population rose from 26.6m to 31.0m between 1990 and 2000 and is expected to have increased by 50% from where it was in 1990 by 2050. The highest growth rate occurs in Australia, where the population grew by 2.1m to reach 19.2m in 2000 and is predicted to reach 26.0m by 2050.
Overall, the countries represented had, and are forecast to have, fairly stable rates of growth over the period although their total populations differ markedly.
Task 2 Model Answer
With technology developing rapidly, working from home has become a reality for many workers, which some would argue only benefits employees. However, I’m afraid I have to disagree with this argument for several reasons.
There are many benefits to having staff work from home. For instance, the cost of paying rent or even a mortgage on office space can be saved when employees work from home. Likewise, the day-to-day running costs of an office, such as power, water, and phone costs, can be reduced to a minimum when staff are based at home.
Some feel that working from home reduces productivity. They argue that there might be many distractions at home, which will impact the quality of work. Also, they feel that employees will lose the professional environment that an office space offers.
But maintaining low staff stress levels is the key to increasing productivity in the workplace, and working from home has been proven to improve worker productivity while facilitating higher levels of happiness. This is because employees feel trusted, made responsible for managing their own time and tasks, without the need for a supervisor monitoring their performance. This, coupled with the increased flexibility that those who work from home can have time for activities such as picking up children, walking the dog, or going to the gym, contribute to worker well-being and satisfaction.
There is also evidence suggesting that allowing employees to work from home helps employers retain staff, which is a definite advantage. Provided with the flexibility of working from home, staff remain loyal and committed to the company. The company retains their knowledge and experience, which are valuable aspects of any organization’s human resource.
To sum up, I firmly believe that working from home is a boon for the employee and the employer.
See also :