Some people believe that it is more important to teach children the literature of their own country than other countries. Do you agree or disagree?
Band 8.0 Sample
It is sometimes argued that we should place more emphasis on teaching local than foreign literature. While it does seem beneficial to teach local literature, I would argue that children should also be taught other nations’ literature.
To begin with, I agree that children could benefit from being taught the literature of their home country. By learning local literature, young students can better understand and appreciate the history of where they were born. For example, since all the poems about wars in [your country] are taught to the students, most of them are aware of how bloody the wars were and how important it is to stop the history from repeating itself. Without local literature, I believe that few students would be interested in studying history.
However, it seems to me that young students should also be taught about foreign works of literature. The first reason is that their home country’s literature may be too boring, which makes learning extremely frustrating. For instance, students have to memorize many poems that are hardly relevant to their lives, and therefore most of them are reluctant to study this subject. Since foreign literature gives them an entirely new learning experience, it could provide them with a motivation to study the issue. Additionally, reading the authors of other countries exposes students to a variety of different cultures, so studying it helps broaden their knowledge about other parts of the world.
In conclusion, while I accept that students can benefit from learning local literature, I believe that foreign works should also be an essential part of the curriculum.
263 words by IELTS high scorer
Also check :