The IELTS Reading Practice Test 53 with Answer keys is a great help to the students who are taking up IELTS examinations. There is a sample of questions that appear in the actual IELTS test which will help them to improve their reading skills.
- Corporate social Responsibility – a new concept of “market”, Photovoltaics on the rooftop, Assessing the risk – Reading Answers in 2017
- Mobile Phones And Driving, The Eiffel Tower, Hazard Management – Reading Answers
- Plant Scents, The Development of Plastics, Global Warming in New Zealand – Reading Answers in 2017
- Going Bananas, Computer Provides More Questions, Save Endangered Language – Reading Answers in 2016
- Hot Air Ballooning, Illegal Downloads – Reading Answers
READING PASSAGE 1
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 1-13 which are based on Reading Passage 1.
LOOKING IN THE TELESCOPE
A story is told that around 400 years ago some children were fooling around in an eyeglass shop. They noticed that when they placed lenses one on top of the other, they were able to see a considerable distance. They played around with the concept for a while, experimenting with what happened when they varied the distance between the lenses. Hans Lippershey, the Dutch lens maker who eventually applied for the first telescope patent, credits children as having been his motivation for the invention of the first telescope.
The first telescopes built in the early 1600s were very primitive inventions allowing the user to see around 3-times further than the naked eye. It was not too long, however, until Italian astronomer Galileo heard about the invention ‘that through use of correctly-positioned lenses, allowed people to see things a long way away’. The tools used in the manufacturing of the first refracting telescope were all Galileo needed to know and within 24 hours he had developed a better one. In fact, the process of improvements Galileo made on Lippershey’s telescope was quite dramatic. Whereas the original version had a magnification of 3, the new telescope had a magnification of around 30. Galileo achieved these extraordinary results by figuring out the combination of the positions of the lenses and also by making his own lenses which were of better quality. Although he originally thought they were stars, the better quality lenses – and some scientific analysis – enabled him to eventually use his telescopes to see the moons of Jupiter. Galileo’s refracting telescopes – so-called due to the way they handled the light that passed through them – were the standard at that time.
Some 70 years later, British scientist Isaac Newton, explored the way a prism refracts 1 white light into an array of colors. He recognized that a lens was a circular prism and that the separation of colors limited the effectiveness of the telescopes in use at the time. Newton created a Reflective Telescope, one that used a dish-shaped or parabolic mirror to collect light and concentrate the image before it was visible in the eyepiece. Thus, lenses used for magnification in telescopes were replaced by mirrors. Mirrors have since been the standard for telescopes. In fact, according to telescope researcher Dr. Carl Addams, the basic designs of telescopes have not changed much in the last 100 years. What has changed, however, is the way technology has been used to improve them. For example, the larger telescopes in the world today are around 10 meters in diameter and the mirrors placed within them are so finely polished that even at the microscopic level there are no scratches or bumps on them at all. To achieve such a flawless surface requires a very expensive process that operates with the utmost precision.
The separation or change of direction of a ray of light when passed through a glass of water.
The mid-1700s saw the discovery and production of the Achromatic telescope. This type of telescope differed from previous ones in the way it handled the different wavelengths of light. The first person who succeeded in making achromatic refracting telescopes seems to have been the Englishman, Chester Moore Hall. The telescope design used two pieces of special optical glass known as crown and flint Each side of each piece was ground and polished and then the two pieces were assembled together. Achromatic lenses bring two wavelengths – typically red and blue – into focus in the same plane. Makers of achromatic telescopes had difficulty locating disks of flint glass of suitable purity needed to construct them. In the late 1700s, prizes were offered by the French Academy of Sciences for any chemist or glass-manufacturer that could create perfect discs of optical flint glass, however, no one was able to provide a large disk of suitable purity and clarity.
Currently the largest telescopes are around eight to ten meters in size. These extremely expensive and sophisticated pieces of equipment are located primarily throughout Europe and America. Dr. Addams believes that the telescopes of the future will be a gigantic improvement in what is currently considered state-of-the-art. Telescopes that are 20 or 30 meters in diameter are currently being planned, and there has been a suggestion put forward by a European firm that they would like to build a 100-meter telescope. Says Addams, ‘The quality of the glass needed to build a 100-meter telescope is like building a lens the size of a football field and having the largest bump in that football field being a ten-thousandth of a human hair’. The engineering and technology required to build such a flawless reflective surface is most impressive.
Questions 1 – 5
Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or D.
Write the correct letter in boxes 1-5 on your answer sheet.
- According to the writer, the first telescope was
- invented by children.
- made by a lens maker.
- a reflective telescope.
- quite a complex piece of equipment.
- The writer states that Galileo
- improved on the design of the first telescope.
- created the first reflective telescope.
- took 24 hours to make a reflective telescope.
- allowed people to see 3 times further than the first telescope.
- The Galileo telescope was better than the first telescope because of it
- used mirrors rather than glass.
- was longer than the first telescope.
- used better lens positioning and quality.
- used better quality lenses and glass.
- The writer states that today large telescopes are
- 20 or 30 meters in size.
- as big as 100 meters.
- very costly items.
- as good as will ever be built.
- Large, powerful telescopes are difficult to build because
- designs have not changed in nearly 100 years.
- it is difficult to locate the flint glass needed for them.
- the area needed to house the telescope is simply too large.
- the lenses must be extremely reflective.
Questions 6 – 10
Classify the following features as belonging to
- the Achromatic telescope
- the Reflective telescope
- the Refracting telescope
Write the correct letter A, B or C, in boxes 6-10 on your answer sheet.
- The first telescopes made.
- It uses a series of lenses one on top of the other.
- Highly polished lenses.
- The first use of mirrors to collect light.
- Two pieces of glass stuck together.
Questions 11 -13
Complete the summary below using words from the passage.
Choose NO MORE THAN THREE WORDS from the passage for each answer.
Write your answers in boxes 11-13 on your answer sheet
There have been a number of changes in telescopes since they were first invented. For example, Galileo’s telescope increased magnification of the previously made telescope by a factor of 30. He did this by altering the lenses 11_______________ and also constructing lenses 12______________. Other improvements followed but the most significant step forward, and still a major factor today in telescope design, has been the inclusion of 13_______________.
READING PASSAGE 2
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 14 – 27 which are based on Reading Passage 2.
The intense rate of change in the world gives rise to numerous new products – many of them electronic. What is brand new and state-of-the-art one month is quickly relegated to old model’ status the next. Within the world of computing, this frenetic pace of change has led to millions of out-dated, worthless products. Keystone, an American-based research company reported. In 2005, one computer became obsolete for every new one introduced in the die market. By the year 2010, experts estimate that in the USA there will be over 500 million obsolete computers. Most of these computers will be destined for landfills, incinerators or hazardous waste exports.’ Old, outdated keyboards, monitors and hard drives all combine to produce what is now widely known as ‘e-waste’ and the way to appropriately dispose of them is proving to be a challenge.
Most computers are a complicated assembly of hundreds of different materials, many of which are highly toxic. Most computer users are unaware that these toxic metals, acids, plastics, and other substances have been shown to be the cause of various blood diseases and cancers, Amongst workers involved in the recycling of computer products, there has been a proliferation of blood diseases Printed circuit boards, for example, contain heavy metals such as antimony, silver, chromium, zinc, lead, tin and copper. Environmentalist Kieran Shaw estimates there is hardly any other product for which the sum of the environmental impacts of raw material, extraction, industrial refining and production, use and disposal is so extensive as for printed circuit boards.
Workers involved in the disposal of computers via incineration are themselves being exposed to significantly high levels of toxicity. Copper, for example, is a catalyst in the release of harmful chemicals when exposed to the high tempera lures of incineration. In US and Canadian environments, incineration is one of the greatest sources of heavy metal contamination of the atmosphere. Unfortunately, another form of incineration, smelting, can present dangers similar to incineration. Concerns have been expressed that the Noranda. The smelter in Quebec, Canada is producing atmospheric pollutants from the residual presence of plastics in the e-scrap.
In an effort to explore other alternatives, landfills have been tried, Studies have shown, however, that even the best landfills are not completely safe, In feet, the shortcomings of dealing with waste via modern landfills are well documented. The main ‘offender’ in the area of metal leaching is mercury. In varying degrees, mercury escapes or leaches from certain electronic devices such as circuit breakers, condensers and computer circuit boards into the soil, According to Phil Stevenson, managing director of CleanCo a recycling plant in the UK, ‘Everyone knows that landfills leak – it has become common knowledge Even the best, state-of-the-art landfills are not completely tight throughout their lifetimes, to one degree or another, a certain amount of chemical and metal leaching occurs The situation is far worse for older or less stringent dump sites. If uncontrolled fires are allowed to burn through these landfill areas, other toxic chemicals such as lead and cadmium are released.
An overwhelming majority of the world’s hazardous e-waste is generated by the industrialized market economies. Because labor costs are cheap and government regulations in some countries are decidedly lax, the exporting of e-waste has been practiced as another method to deal with its disposal. In the USA for example, Datatek, a research company, estimated that it was 12 times cheaper to ship old computer monitors to China than it was to recycle them. Data on the prevalence of this activity is scarce due to past bad publicity and dealers of e-scrap not bothering to determine the final destination of the products they sell in 1989 the world community established the Basel Convention on the Transboundary Movement of Hazardous Waste for final Disposal to stop the industrialized nations of the OECD from dumping their waste on and in less-developed countries.
Europe has taken the lead on e-waste management by requiring governments to implement laws controlling the production and disposal of electrical products. The European Union (EL) lias drafted legislation on Waste from Electrical and Electronic Equipment (the WE EE Directive) based on a concept known as Extended Producer Responsibility (EFR), Essentially, EFR places the responsibility’ of the production and disposal squarely on the shoulders of the producers of electronic products, it requires that producers consider carefully the environmental impact of the products they bring to the marketplace. The aim of EPR is to encourage producers of electrical equipment to prevent pollution and reduce resource and energy use at each stage of the product file cycle. The lead-in Europe has been necessary’ because WERE is about three times higher than the growth of any other municipal waste streams.
WEE legislation will phase-out the use of toxic substances such as mercury, cadmium, and lead in electronic and electrical goods by the year 2008. It will require producers of electrical equipment to be responsible financially for the collection, recycling, and disposal of their products. It has stipulated that products containing any lead, mercury, cadmium, and other toxic substances must not be incinerated. It encourages producers to integrate an increasing quantity of recycled material in any new products they produce. In fact, between 70% and 90% by weight of all collected equipment must be recycled or re-used. These directives will go a long way toward improving the e-waste problem in Europe and other governments of the world should look seriously at the implementation of some or all of the legislation.
Questions 14 – 20
Reading Passage 2 has 7 paragraphs, A-G.
Choose the correct heading for each paragraph from the list of headings below.
Write the correct number, i-xi, in boxes 14-20 on your answer sheet.
List of Headings
- Exporting e-waste
- The hazards of burning computer junk
- Blame developed countries for e-waste
- Landfills are not satisfactory
- Producer’s legal responsibility
- The dangers of computer circuit boards
- Electronic changes bring waste
- European e-waste laws
- The dangerous substances found in computers
- Landfills and mercury leaching
- New products must contain recycled products
- Paragraph A
- Paragraph B
- Paragraph C
- Paragraph D
- Paragraph E
- Paragraph F
- Paragraph G
Questions 21 -24
Look at the following list of statements (Questions 21-24) and the list of companies below.
Match each statement with the correct company.
Write the correct letter A-D in boxes 21-24 on your answer sheet.
NB You may use any letter more than once.
- waste sites without strict dumping rules leads to big problems
- e-waste should be re-located to other countries
- most old computers will be buried or burned
- it is impossible to contain metal waste in soil
List of companies
- Noranda Smelter
Questions 25 -27
Choose THREE letters, A-G,
Write the correct letters in boxes 25-27 on your answer sheet.
According to the information in the text, which THREE of the following pollution laws have been proposed in Europe?
- Manufacturers will have to pay for the disposal of their products.
- Manufacturers must dispose of the electronic goods they produce.
- Products made in Europe must be completely recyclable.
- Consumers are responsible for the disposal of the products they purchase.
- Disposal of products containing mercury should be incinerated.
- Other governments around the world will implement EU laws.
- A large percentage of old products must be included in new products.
READING PASSAGE 3
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 28-40 which are bused on Reading Passage 3.
PREPARING FOR THE THREAT
It is an unfortunate fact that over the past 20 pars, around 260 million people a year have been affected by natural disasters around the world. Regrettably, a vast majority of the victims of this staggering number are from developing countries. Whether it be earthquakes, tornadoes, floods, volcanoes or tsunamis, over the past twenty years, natural disasters have been happening more frequently and affecting more people than ever before. It follows that the international community should address the issue of ‘disaster preparedness’ and establish a process by which natural disasters are dealt with.
On December 26, 2004, a massive earthquake centered off the coast of the Indonesian island of Sumatra caused a series of deadly tsunamis in the Indian Ocean. The damage from this extraordinary disaster was estimated to be in the vicinity of US $ 13 billion – the equivalent to the combined GDP 1 of the world’s developing countries for an entire year. In a matter of seconds, the tsunami waves wiped out the long years of struggle for development, and the world was once again reminded of the fearsome and destructive power of natural disasters.
Gross Domestic Product is the total value of goods and services produced by a country in a year.
The United Nations designated the 1990s as the International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction and has been active in promoting and developing international cooperation on disaster preparedness. The UN’s Yokohama Strategy for a Safer World: Guidelines for Natural Disaster Prevention, Preparedness and Mitigation was adopted in 1994. Among the guidelines, developing countries are encouraged to organize and implement their domestic resources for disaster reduction activities and donor developed countries are encouraged to give greater priority to disaster prevention, mitigation, and preparedness in their assistance programs and budgets, including through increasing financial contributions.
In January 2005 the UN World Conference on Disaster Reduction (WCDR) met in Kobe, Hyogo Prefecture to discuss and debate how the international community should address issues of disaster preparedness and mitigation. The meeting itself attended by over 4,000 delegates representing some 168 countries occurred almost 10 years to the day after the Great Hanshin earthquake in Kobe. The January meeting of the WCDR in Kobe provided experts and scientists from over 150 countries, government officials, Non- Government Organisation (NGOs) and United Nations representatives an opportunity to review the Yokohama Strategy. It recorded on the 2005-15 Yokohama Strategy Action Plan that participant countries and agencies should work over the next 10 years to reduce vulnerability to natural disasters. The Action Plan encourages as a first step, the integration of disaster prevention programs in all development and policy-making plaits for all countries. Jim Edgeland, UN representative stated, “Disaster risk reduction is not an additional expense – it is an essential investment in our common future, but the benefits of this investment will be calculated not only in dollars or euros or yen saved, but most importantly, in saved lives in every corner of the globe.”
Perhaps the most significant work done at the WCDR meetings was the drafting and adoption of the Hyogo Declaration, This document expresses the united determination of the international community to rely not only on advanced technology or facilities for disaster preparedness but on a people-centered early warning system. The people-centered system requires effective communication and education in the building of disaster-resilient countries and communities.
As the intergovernmental panels of the WCDR were meeting, the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake Forum was also underway. The earthquake measuring a magnitude of 7.3, led to the Joss of over 6,400 lives and widespread destruction affecting some 460,000 households. This public forum offered a variety of sessions, during which the lessons learned from the disastrous earthquake were discussed. Earthquake expert Professor Tomohiro Kawata said, “Because this disaster happened over a decade ago, the memory of the devastation can be forgotten. Part of our gathering here today is to make sure that we do not forget what happened back in 1995.’’ Also included were some personal stories from the earthquake victims themselves. Earthquake victim Kumiko Nagota told attendees that her house collapsed in the Kobe earthquake and she was trapped under it. She tried to call for help but after a while, she lost her voice and just had to wait there until help came. Attendees were told of the bow the town mobilized to facilitate recovery and reconstruction. An exhibition hall showed pictures of mounds of rubble produced by the earthquake as well as a display of objects donated by earthquake victims including a broken clock and a child’s toy that molted in the fires caused by the earthquake. Said Kawata, “As well as being a memorial, our facility and, indeed this forum, is a place to learn from earthquake experiences and incorporate the things we learned into our preparations for future disasters”. During the forum, it was agreed that in May 2005, a new hub for the coordination of international disaster recovery support activities would be established in Kobe.
Questions 28 – 31
Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 3?
In boxes 28-31 on your answer sheet, write
TRUE if the statement agrees with the information
FALSE if the statement contradicts the information
NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this
- Mostly people from poorer countries are affected by natural disasters.
- Present-day natural disasters are more dangerous than disasters of the past.
- It will take the countries affected by the tsunami many years to rebuild.
- Being prepared and knowing what to do in a disaster should be a global issue.
Questions 32 -35
Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or D.
Write the correct letter in boxes 27-31 on your answer sheet
- According to the passage, reducing the risk of disasters is important because
- countries can then focus on growth and development.
- communities will be drawn together in support of each other.
- help international communities to be more economically stable.
- it will save lives and money.
- According to the writer, the most important outcome of the World Conference on Disaster Reduction (WCDR) was the
- discussion and debate amongst the international community attendees.
- a chance for participants to review the Yokohama Strategy.
- writing and acceptance of the Hyogo Declaration.
- acknowledgment that disaster risk reduction is an investment in the future.
- The town of Kobe was effectively rebuilt due to
- the support of the United Nations.
- the people of Kobe.
- the Government of Japan.
- the leadership of Professor Kawata.
- The stated purpose of the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake Forum was
- to help others Ire better prepared for any future natural disasters.
- for people to learn more about natural disasters.
- to remember the Kobe earthquake of 1995.
- for people to remember and team from what happened.
Questions 36 – 40
Look at the following statements (Questions 36 – 40) and the list of disaster control initiatives below.
Match each statement with the correct disaster control initiative, A-D.
Write the correct letter, A-D, in boxes 36-40 on your answer sheet.
- people should be the early broadcasters of disaster information
- led to a new central area for support in disaster recovery
- a reminder of the impact of disasters
- in times of disaster, developed countries should do more to help less-developed countries
- national development and disaster prevention should be considered at the same time
Disaster Control Initiatives
- Hyogo Declaration
- Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake Forum
- World Conference on Disaster Reduction
- Yokohama Strategy for a Safer World
ANSWER KEY FOR IELTS READING PRACTICE TEST
A is not correct because the text says that children were fooling around and that “Hans Lippershey, the Dutch lensmaker… credits children as having been his motivation for the invention of the first telescope”. This is an indirect way of saying that Hans invented the telescope. Paragraph 2 also states that Galileo “improved on Lippershey’s telescope”.
B & C are wrong because the telescope Galileo designed was a refracting telescope. D is wrong because Galileo’s telescope allowed people to see 30 times further.
A is wrong because Galileo’s telescope did not use mirrors, that came later. B. is obviously the wrong D is wrong because although he used better quality lenses, the other half of the reason was because of the positioning of the lenses.
A is wrong because it says that 20 or 30 meters “are currently being planned” in other words, they have not been built yet. B. is wrong for the same reason as A. D is the opposite of what is written: “Dr. Addams believes that the telescopes of the future will be a gigantic improvement in what is currently considered state-of-the-art.”
A is a correct statement but has nothing to do with why large telescopes are difficult to build. B is also a correct statement but flint is not used in the construction of modern telescopes. C is simply false.
The tools used in the manufacturing of the first Refracting telescope were all Galileo need to know and within 24 hours he had developed a better one. In fact, the process of improvements Galileo made on Lippershey’s telescope was quite dramatic.
Paragraph 1 talks about the refracting telescope: ‘They noticed that when they placed lenses one on top of the other, they were able to see a considerable distance.’
The 4th paragraph: ‘The telescope design used two pieces of special optical glass known as crown and flint glass. Each side of each piece was ground and polished, and then the two pieces were assembled together.’
Talking about the Reflective telescope in paragraph 3: ‘…lenses used for magnification in telescopes were replaced by mirrors.’
In the 4th paragraph: ‘The telescope design used two pieces of special optical glass known as crown and flint glass.’
The 2nd paragraph states: ‘Galileo achieved these extraordinary results by figuring out the combination of the positions of the lenses and also by making his own lenses which were of better quality.’
- of better quality
The 2nd paragraph states: ‘Galileo achieved these extraordinary results by… making his own lenses which were of better quality.’
The 3rd paragraph states: ‘Thus, lenses used for magnification in telescopes were replaced by mirrors. Mirrors have since been the standard for telescopes.’
Paragraph A discusses in the first sentence (i.e topic sentence) ’The intense rate of change’ of electronic products.
The next main point in support of the change is many products are then rendered ‘obsolete’ with ‘500 million obsolete computers…destined for landfills, incinerators or hazardous waste exports’
Note: although exporting is mentioned in this paragraph, it is NOT the focus of it so it cannot be the answer.
Once you are quite sure you have the right paragraph, read in-depth to confirm your choice.
Paragraph B discusses in the first sentence that many of the materials found in computers are ‘highly toxic’. It continues by giving details about the different types of chemicals contained in them – ‘antimony, silver, chromium, zinc, lead…’
Note: although circuit boards arc referenced as having a very negative impact on the environment; the focus of the paragraph is not in this area.
Paragraph C is clearly discussing the burning or incineration of computer junk. It also points out some of the difficulties associated with this activity – ‘..incineration is one of the greatest sources of heavy metal contamination of the atmosphere.’
Paragraph D discusses landfills in the very’ first sentence and continues to discuss them throughout. The negative aspects of landfills are the particular focus – ‘even the best landfills are not completely safe’, ‘landfills leak’.
Note: the answer is not x even though there are references to mercury, it is not the focus of the paragraph.
Paragraph E. states ‘…exporting of e-waste has been practiced as another method to deal with its disposal’ and that ‘it was 12 times cheaper to ship old computer monitors to China than it was to recycle them.’
Note: the answer is not iii even though this is the feature of the introductory sentence. Be careful about this.
Paragraph F deals specifically with producers of electrical products disposing of them responsibly – ‘production and disposal..’ also, ‘Essentially, EPR places the responsibility of the production and disposal squarely on the shoulders of the producers of electronic products.’
Paragraph G focuses on law introduced by the WEEE – ‘products containing lead, mercury, ..must not be incinerated’ and ‘70% and 90% by weight of all collected equipment must be re-cycled’. Although it mentions that new products must contain parts of recycled products, this is only a part of the paragraph.
Paragraph D: CleanCo states that ‘The situation (leaking of waste in dumps) is far worse for older or less stringent dump sites.’
Paragraph E: Datatek states, ‘it was 1 2 times cheaper to ship old computer monitors to China than it was to recycle them.’
Paragraph A states, ‘Keyston…reported that…. Most of these (old, outdated) computers will be destined for landfills (buried), incinerators or hazardous waste exports.’
Paragraph D: Everyone knows that landfills leak… Even the best, state-of-the-art landfills are not completely tight throughout their lifetimes.
- A, B, G (Answers in any order)
A is correct. Paragraph C states: ‘It (the WEEE law) will require producers of electrical equipment to be responsible financially for the collection, recycling, and disposal of their products.’
B. is correct. Paragraph F states; ‘Essentially, EPR places the responsibility of the production and disposal squarely on the shoulders of the producers of electronic products.’
G is correct because Paragraph G states: ‘…between 70% and 90% by weight of all collected (recycled) equipment must be re-cycled or re-used.’
C is wrong because completely = 100% and the law states’ 70-90%… must be recycled’. D is wrong, it’s actually the producers who are responsible for the disposal of products. E is wrong, it’s actually the opposite of what the law states. F is not mentioned any wire re in the text.
Regrettably, a vast majority of the victims of this staggering number are from developing countries.
The text says, ‘„.natural disasters have been happening more frequently and with greater impact than ever before. ‘This does NOT mean they are worse titan natural disasters of the past hence, NG is the answer!
There is nothing in the passage about this!
The text says, ‘It follows that the international community should address the issue of ‘disaster preparedness’ and establish a process by which natural disasters are dealt with.’
The 4th paragraph states: That the benefits of Disaster risk reduction ‘…will be calculated not only in dollars or euros or yen saved, but most importantly, in saved lives in every corner of the globe,”
A & C are not mentioned in the text. B. is mentioned in the passage but only in connection with rebuilding Kobe, not in the reduction of disaster risk.
The 5th paragraph states: ‘Perhaps the most significant work done at the WCDR meetings was the drafting and adoption of the Hyogo Declaration.’
A is not correct because the people present are themselves not an outcome. B. is wrong because the WCDR was an opportunity to review the Yokohama Strategy. D is certainly a true statement but the passage does not list it as an important outcome.
The final paragraph states, ‘Attendees were told of how the town mobilized to facilitate recovery and reconstruction.’
There is nothing in the passage about A or C at all. Professor Kawata is an expert on earthquakes but there is nothing in the passage that says his leadership helped to rebuild Kobe – D is wrong.
The final paragraph states: ‘This public forum offered a variety of sessions, during which the lessons learned from the disastrous earthquake were discussed. ‘ and ‘…part of our gathering here today is to make sure that we do not forget what happened back in 1955’ and ‘As well as being a memorial… this forum, is a place to learn from earthquake experiences and incorporate the things we learned into our preparations for future disasters”. This means that the purpose of the forum is to remember what happened and also learn from the experience.
A is not correct as of the focus in on earthquakes specifically and not ‘natural disasters’ generally. U is not correct for the same reasons as A above. Although C is mentioned as being a part of the reason for the forum, it is only part of the reason and therefore not the best answer.
This document (i.e. the Hyogo Declaration)’…expresses the united determination of the international community to rely…on a people-centered early warning system’
In the above sentence, people are introduced as a contrast to advanced technology, that is, people will broadcast information on disasters (in addition to technology).
It was agreed at the lime (i.e. the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake Forum) that in May 2005, a new hub for the coordination of international disaster recovery support activities would be established in Kobe.
This public forum offered a variety of sessions, during which the lessons learned from the disastrous earthquake were discussed. “Because this disaster happened over a decade ago, the memory of the devastation can be forgotten, part of our gathering here today is to make sure that we do not forget wit at happened back in 1995”. An exhibition hall showed pictures of mounds of rubble produced by the earthquake as well as displayed objects donated by earthquake victims… “As well as being a memorial, our facility is a place to learn from earthquake experiences and incorporate the things we learned into our preparations for future disasters”.
Among the guidelines (i.e. the Yokohama Strategy for a Safer World)… donor developed countries are encouraged to give greater priority to disaster prevention, mitigation, and preparedness in their assistance programs and budgets, including through increasing financial contributions.
The Action Plan (i.e. the Yokohama Strategy for a Safer World) encourages as a first step, the integration of disaster prevention programs in all development and policymaking plans for all countries.