Government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion – IELTS Writing Task 2 Discursive Essays
Updated On
The Essay Writing section of the IELTS Writing Module can be a difficult task for many IELTS Aspirants. Thus, it is vital that you polish your essay writing skills before attempting the IELTS.
Below is a sample IELTS Essay for the IELTS Essay topic:
Some people believe government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both views and give your opinion. OR
Some people think that governments should spend money on railways. Others believe that there should be more investment into new roads. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Band 8.5 Sample Essay 1:
Traffic congestion has become the bane of citizens in many parts of the world. In order to mitigate this problem, some suggest that public transportation, such as trains and subway lines should be constructed. Meanwhile, others are firm in their belief that building wider roads makes more sense. Both of these methods will be analysed below.
IELTS Writing (General) Actual Tests eBook Combo (July - October 2022) [Task 1+ Task 2]
4.8 of 89 Reviews
Written by professional IELTS teachers to help candidates on the big day
Written by professional IELTS teachers to help candidates on the big day
On the one hand, building trains is an effective method to improve traffic condition. There is compelling evidence to support investment in public transportation. In countries where subway systems are up to standard, the number of private vehicles that participate in traffic is small, and city dwellers can save hours of delay and also thousands of dollars on travel expenses. That is not to mention a significant number of gallons of fuel saved, which means slowing down the exploitation of natural resources.
IELTS Actual Test Questions (February-March 2023)
4.8 of 5
4.6 of 5
4.8 of 5
4.8 of 5
There are, however, others who express doubts on this approach. Their suggestion is that a better way to alleviate traffic jam is to make bigger road systems. The undeniable fact is that in many developing countries today, roads are narrow and in a desperate state of disrepair, which greatly obstructs the travels to their destinations. Someone’s small accidents, a flat tyre, for example, can bring traffic to a halt, which is a commonly-seen problem in roads that have only two lanes.
To conclude, both methods discussed above provide sustained relief on our roadways; however, it is my opinion that the method to build trains and subway makes more sense in terms of environmental protection.
Band 8.0 Model Essay 2:
The high volume of traffic is a huge problem for many big cities. Therefore, there is a widely held view among a number of people that governmental bodies should pour money in building such public transport systems as train and subway lines. Others, however, argue that road expansion is the more proper way. To my mind, though widening streets benefits us, this can not alleviate traffic congestion.
It is not by chance that developing public vehicles is considered one of the common approaches to reduce traffic jams. To day, people have indeed used too many private vehicles whose disadvantages can be listed. The long line of cars at peak hours is a typical example, which may lead to lengthy delays. This can also cause other serious consequences such as traffic accidents. Accordingly, it is widely believed that building underground tunnels can solve heavy traffic jams due to empty spaces beneath the ground.
However, according to others, road extension is a better alternative because this solution does not demand more efforts. Also, extending road does not seem as costly as developing underground transport systems. Another reason for this is that bigger roads will create more spaces for vehicle owners, helping them to circulate easily during peak hours. By doing so, traffic congestion can be alleviated.
In my opinion, road expansion is not a long-term measure because people tend to drive their vehicles regularly on newly widened streets. In other words, traffic jams might continue to occur. Therefore, government should take other solutions into consideration for safer transportation.
Bonus topics:
- One way to solve the problem of congestion in cities is to build sky trains which run overhead rather than on or under the ground. What are the advantages and disadvantages of using this solution to solve congestion?
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Also check :
Practice IELTS Writing Task 2 based on Essay types
Explore other Writing Actual Tests
Post your Comments
4 Comments
Ibukun
Posted on Jun 8, 2022
QUESTION: Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.
Transportation is the movement from one place to another. Money should be spent on rail system instead of roads by the Government. I strongly agree to this because it is cost effective and it can be used to transport heavy loads to a long distance.
Railway is one of the mode of transport. Government should invest funds on rail system because it is cost effective. For example, it has a lower fuel cost compare to road transport and the amount passengers pay is at a lower price, thus making it convenient for the less privilege. Furthermore, rail can be used to move heavy loads to a long distance, this can be beneficial for shippers with large goods, thereby, promoting import and export of goods from one country to another.
In addition, if budget is allocated to rail means of transportation, it will reduce traffic congestion and thus reducing stress and delay in reaching to target destinations. For instance, on road with traffic jam; an individual may not be able to meet up with the appointment and hooked up in a place for a long period of time can results into stress causing adverse effect to the body system such as headaches and generalised body pain.
However, road transport cannot be eradicated because some countryside has no access to the railway stations. Therefore, Government should also look into funding the constructions of dual modern road for free movement without delay and reduction of road traffic accident from the cause.
In conclusion, if government put more funds on railway system by making mode of transport cheap and reducing road traffic congestion and more also they should look into ways of improving road transports.
Reply
kasturika
Posted on Jun 8, 2022
Band Score – 5.5
Concentrate on the correct usage of articles, prepositions, plural and verb forms, subject verb agreement and punctuation.
Learn error-free sentence formation and follow the rules of capitalization.
Use C2 level of words.
Swathi b
Posted on Sep 27, 2021
Some people believe government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both views and give your opinion
========================================================
Spending money in enhancing the means of transport is often a context which has numerous opinions and equal number of oppositions. Few people opine that investments should be directed towards the railways development, while others argue that roadways need a higher share of the funds. In my opinion, funding rail and road routes are of equal importance and this essay will discuss the same.
Firstly, several people believe that increasing train routes will help bring down the traffic congestion issue, which is not feasible in every situation. Moreover, having more surface tracks needs huge land area for building railways stations and the tracks will be longer in comparison with the roadways. However, underground trains have been proved to be a better option. Countries with subway systems have provided significant evidence of their effectiveness in reducing traffic congestion. Hence, laying train tracks strategically is important rather than merely increasing the counts.
Secondly, widening and maintaining the existing roads is equally essential to accommodate the increased use of private vehicles. Constructing flyovers in areas where widening is not possible is a tremendous solution. Several such issues in Hyderabad are being solved by planning new flyovers. Also, damaged roads cause major congestion which needs to be addressed by proper maintenance. Thus, government should spend enough money on roads development as well.
To sum it up, focusing on enhancing a single transport means alone is never a good thought. And I think, officials have to consider investing in both roads and railways, as and when required rather than investing in only one of them.
Reply
Janice Thompson
Posted on Sep 29, 2021
Band score: 6.0
Lexical Resource: Some words like “roads” are repeated often. Try to use synonyms. Learn C2 vocabulary.