Mass Production – IELTS Reading Answers
Table of Contents
Limited-Time Offer : Access a FREE 10-Day IELTS Study Plan!
The Academic passage, ‘Mass Production Reading Answers’, is a reading passage that consists of 13 questions.
With diligent practice, the Reading Module can be the top-scoring category for IELTS aspirants. To score well, you must understand how to approach and answer the different question types in the Reading Module.
Ideally, you should not spend more than 20 minutes on a passage. You must scan the material for important terms, comprehend the subject, and then respond in accordance with the instructions. Also, read the IELTS reading passage, pick out significant words, and recognize synonyms in order to provide a one-word response.
Take the reading practice passage, Mass Production below, and try more IELTS reading practice tests.
The question types found in this passage are:
- Matching Headings (Q. 1-5)
- Multiple Choice Question (Q. 6-8) & (Q. 13)
- Summary Completion (Q. 9-12)
Reading Passage
Mass Production
Despite its obvious connection, mass production was not a corollary to the modern Industrial Revolution. Various mass production techniques had been practiced in ancient times, from ceramic production in the Orient to manufacturing in ancient Greece. The British were most likely the first modern economy to adapt water-powered, then steam-powered, machinery to industrial production methods, most notably in the textile industry. Yet it is generally agreed that modern mass production techniques came into widespread use through the innovation of an assortment of Americans who substantially improved the ancient techniques. Indeed, this modern mass production was called the American System and its early successes are often attributed to Eli Whitney, who adapted mass production techniques and the interchangeability of parts to the manufacture of muskets for the U.S. government in the late 1790s.
In the late 18th century, French General Jean-Baptiste Vaquette de Gribeauval promoted standardized weapons, which became known as the Systeme Gribeauval after it was issued as a royal order in 1765. (Its focus at the time was artillery more than muskets or handguns.) The crucial step toward interchangeability in metal parts was taken by Simeon North, working only a few miles from Eli Terry. North created one of the world’s first true milling machines to do metal shaping that previously was done by hand with a file. Diana Muir believes that North’s milling machine was online around 1816. While Whitney was certainly an innovator of the American System, others maintain that Whitney’s parts were not truly interchangeable and that credit should more appropriately go to John Hall, the New England gunsmith who built Muskets with flintlock for the United States government at the Harper’s Ferry armory. Flintlock, as it was implied meant people used it to trigger the gun. Hall, born in Maine in 1769, built many of the machine tools needed for precision manufacturing and instituted a system that employed accurate gauges for measuring every aspect and piece of work his factory produced. Consequently, he achieved a much higher level of interchangeability and precision than did Whitney.
Still others maintain that the credit for these modern innovations should go to a French gunsmith whose methods and results predated those of Whitney and Hall by at least a decade. In Britain, and somewhat simultaneously with Whitney, the Frenchman Marc Isambard Brunei adapted steam-driven machinery and assembly-line techniques to the production of 130,000 pulleys for the marine industry in just one year. Brunei’s achievements were made possible by the design and manufacture of several machine tools by the noted British inventor, Henry Maudslay.
Maudslay’s contribution to modern mass production was the invention of precision machine tools capable of producing the identical parts necessary for mass production techniques which made producing guns cheaper. It is generally conceded that the British machine tool industry was far more advanced than that of the Americans in these early stages of mass production development. Simultaneous with Whitney’s innovations in the United States were those of Oliver Evans, whose many inventions in the flour milling process led to an automated mill that could be run by a singer miller.
Samuel Colt and Elisha King Root were also very successful innovators in the development of industrial processes that could mass-produce interchangeable parts for the assembly-line production of firearms. Colt and Root wished to advance the machining of parts so that even the most minute of tasks could be performed with the precision that they believed only machines could achieve. In these endeavors ), Colt and Root were largely successful.
Eli Terry also adapted mass production methods to clockmaking in the early 1800s, and George Eastman made innovations to assembly-line techniques in the manufacture and development of photographic film later in the century. Credit for the development of large-scale, assembly-line, mass-production techniques is usually given to Henry Ford and his innovative Model T production methods. Henry Ford had his workers standing in one place while parts were brought by on conveyor belts, and the car itself moved past the workers on another conveyor belt. Bodies were built on one line and the chassis and drive train were built on another. When both were essentially complete, the body was lowered onto the chassis for final assembly. Around the same time, the production of guns also entered into the assembly line.
Despite the fact that he was not the first, Ford can certainly be viewed as the most successful of these early innovators due to one simple fact—Ford envisioned and fostered mass consumption as a corollary to mass production. Ford’s techniques lessened the time needed to build a Model T from about twelve and a half hours to an hour and a half; the price was reduced as well—from $850 for the first Model T in 1908, to only $290 in 1927 after assembly-line techniques were introduced in 1913. The automobile was no longer a luxury for the rich, the Model T fast became a necessity for nearly everyone. Indeed, Ford sold almost half of all of the automobiles bought worldwide from 1908 to 1927—the years of Model T production. Apart from this, people showed different views over whether guns should be involved in mass production. The expense opposition to ammunition was the first one to trigger the debate. Other equipment involved in war or preparation for war was also against. Let alone all these required a lot of workforces to accomplish.
Assembly-line techniques also required that the manual skills necessary to build a product be altered. Previous to mass production techniques, as seen in the early manufacture of firearms, each workman was responsible for the complete manufacture and assembly of all of the component parts needed to build any single product. Mass production and parts interchangeability demanded that all parts be identical and the individual worker no longer be allowed the luxury of building a complete product based on his personal skills and inclinations. Machines came to dictate the production process, and each part—once created individually by hand—was now duplicated by a machine process that was merely guided by human control. The craft tradition, dominant in human endeavor for centuries, was abandoned in favor of a process that created parts by machine. Furthermore, assembly of these machine-made parts was divided into a series of small repetitive steps that required much less skill than traditional craftsmanship. Consequently, modern mass production techniques, while certainly increasing the efficiency of the manufacturing process and bringing industrial products within the reach of virtually all of humanity, apart from manufacturing ballpoint pens, making of gun is also part of it. But safety is also a factor to consider. People succeeded in restrain the production of guns resulting in only 4 manufactures being permitted to produce guns in mass production.
Questions 1-6
List of Headings
- The appearance of precision machine tools
- Different techniques applied to mass production
iii. Prominent researchers’ work dedicated to mass production of firearm-making
- The disagreement on the first person who invented real interchangeable parts instead of Whitney
- Successful elements for imposing restrictions on the production of guns
- Controversy on the permission of guns production
vii. The use of mass production to manufacture guns
viii. The significant role of interchangeable parts
Example Answer Paragraph A ii
1 Paragraph C
2 Paragraph D
3 Paragraph E
4 Paragraph F
5 Paragraph G
6 Paragraph H
Questions 7-9
7 What is the function of flintlock as mentioned in the passage?
A Grind the gun
B Decorate the gun
C Fire the gun
D Maintain the gun
8 Why does the author quote an example concerning Ford?
A To demonstrate that mass production needed detailed techniques
B To show that every object could be detached into several parts
C To emphasize that Ford was a successful enterprise
D To stress that cars were popular at that time in the U.S.
9 What is the main contribution of Maudslay?
A Introduced assembly line for producing interchangeable parts of guns
B Created useful tools for manufacture of guns with economic feasibility
C Lessened the time for making guns
D Set a standard of making guns and the standard of interchangeable parts
Questions 10-12
People mainly expressed 10 ……………… to buying ammunition after the success of applying assembly lines to the production of automobiles which led to the same practice for guns followed by a heated debate over this application. Besides, another 11 ……………… were needed in the war which demanded a big 12 ……………… to support.
Question 13
13 Which might be the best subtitle for the passage?
14 The origin of the auto assembly line
15 A marvelous advancement in firearm production
16 The origin of mass production
17 The significance of producing interchangeable parts
Mass Production Reading Answers Explanation
1 Answer: iv
Question type: Matching Headings
Answer location: Paragraph C
Answer explanation: In the given location, it is given that “Still others maintain that the credit for these modern innovations should go to a French gunsmith whose methods and results predated those of Whitney and Hall by at least a decade.”. This shows that the third paragraph discusses the disagreement regarding the first person who invented interchangeable parts. Hence, the answer is iv (The disagreement on the first person who invented real interchangeable parts instead of Whitney).
2 Answer: i
Question type: Matching Headings
Answer location: Paragraph D
Answer explanation: In the mentioned paragraph, it is stated that “Maudslay’s contribution to modern mass production was the invention of precision machine tools capable of producing the identical parts necessary for mass production techniques which made producing guns cheaper.”. It can be concluded that the fourth paragraph refers to the appearance of precision machine tools. Hence, the answer is i (The appearance of precision machine tools).
3 Answer: iii
Question type: Matching Headings
Answer location: Paragraph E
Answer explanation: In the fifth paragraph, it is specified that “Samuel Colt and Elisha King Root were also very successful innovators in the development of industrial processes that could mass produce interchangeable parts for the assembly-line production of firearms.”. In other words, the fifth paragraph introduces us to prominent researchers like Samuel Colt and Elisha King Root whose work was dedicated to mass production of firearm making. Hence, the answer is iii (Prominent researchers’ work dedicated to mass production of firearm making).
4 Answer: vii
Question type: Matching Headings
Answer location: Paragraph F
Answer explanation: In the mentioned paragraph, it is stated that “Eli Terry also adapted mass production methods…Around the same time, production of guns also entered into the assembly line.”. It can be pointed out that the sixth paragraph informs us that the use of mass production was done to manufacture guns. Hence, the answer is vii (The use of mass production to manufacture guns).
Unlock Explanations
If you want to have a look at the remaining explanations, sign up!
5 Answer: vi
Question type: Matching Headings
Answer location: Paragraph G
Answer explanation: Through a reference line like, “Apart from this, people showed different views over whether guns should be involved in mass production.”, it can be concluded that the seventh paragraph addresses the controversy on the mass production of guns. Hence, the answer is vi (Controversy on the permission of guns production).
6 Answer: v
Question type: Matching Headings
Answer location: Paragraph H
Answer explanation: In the mentioned section, it is stated that “Assembly-line techniques also required that the manual skills necessary to build a product be altered…The craft tradition, dominant in human endeavor for centuries, was abandoned in favor of a process that created parts by machine.Furthermore, assembly of these machine-made parts was divided into a series of small repetitive steps that required much less skill than traditional craftsmanship.”. Based on this reference, it can be concluded that the last paragraph deals with various elements for imposing restrictions on the production of guns. Hence, the answer is v (Successful elements for imposing restrictions on the production of guns).
7 Answer: C
Question type: Multiple Choice Question
Answer location: Paragraph B, line 6
Answer explanation: In the second paragraph, it is said that “Flintlock ,as it was implied, meant people used it to trigger the gun.”. This points out that the function of flintlock is to fire (trigger) the gun. Hence, the answer is C (Fire the gun).
8 Answer: B
Question type: Multiple Choice Question
Answer location: Paragraph F, line 3 – line 5
Answer explanation: The following lines –Henry Ford had his workers standing in one place while parts were brought by on conveyor belts, and the car itself moved past the workers on another conveyor belt. Bodies were built on one line and the chassis and drive train were built on another. When both were essentially complete, the body was lowered onto the chassis for final assembly.– establishes the fact that the author quotes an example concerning Ford to show that objects can be detached into several parts. Hence, the answer is B (To show that every object could be detached into several parts).
9 Answer: B
Question type: Multiple Choice Question
Answer location: Paragraph D, line 1
Answer explanation: In the specific line, it is mentioned that “Maudslay’s contribution to modern mass production was the invention of precision machine tools capable of producing the identical parts necessary for mass production techniques which made producing guns cheaper.”. In other words, it can be said that the main contribution of Maudslay is to create useful tools for the manufacture of guns with economic feasibility (cheaper). Hence, the answer is B (Created useful tools for manufacture of guns with economic feasibility).
10 Answer: opposition
Question type: Summary Completion
Answer location: Paragraph G, line 5 – line 6
Answer explanation: In Paragraph G, it is stated that “Apart from this, people showed different views over whether guns should be involved in mass production. The expense opposition to ammunition was the first one to trigger the debate.”. This statement indicates that after the success of applying assembly line to the production of automobiles which led to the same practice for guns, a heated debate over this application began. Hence, the answer is ‘opposition’.
11 Answer: equipment
Question type: Summary Completion
Answer location: Paragraph G, line 7
Answer explanation: The given line specifies that “Other equipment involved in war or preparation for war was also against.”. It is indicated that other equipment was also needed for preparation for war. Hence, the answer is ‘equipment’.
12 Answer: workforce
Question type: Summary Completion
Answer location: Paragraph G, line 8
Answer explanation: In the paragraph, it is given “Let alone all these required a lot of workforce to accomplish.”. This reference proves that guns and other equipment required for war needed a large workforce. Hence, the answer is ‘workforce’.
13 Answer: C
Question type: Multiple Choice Question
Answer location: Whole Passage
Answer explanation: Each paragraph of the passage deals with the origin and different stages and aspects of mass production which began with machines, and cars and moved to guns. Hence, the answer is C (The origin of mass production).
Imagine the confidence you’ll gain as you master new skills or the doors that will open as you excel in your English proficiency. The journey of self-improvement is a rewarding one, and we are here to be your trusted companions on this exciting quest.
Sign up to IELTSMaterial now and get FREE 1:1 IELTS counseling.
Also, check:
Practice IELTS Reading based on question types
Start Preparing for IELTS: Get Your 10-Day Study Plan Today!
Recent Articles
Haniya Yashfeen
Haniya Yashfeen
Haniya Yashfeen
Raajdeep Saha
Post your Comments