Rich Countries Should not Employ Skilled Labour from Poor Countries- IELTS Writing Task 2

Rich countries should not employ skilled labour from poor countries, as poor countries need the workers more.

To what extent do you agree with this statement?

Outline

Essay Type

Opinion essay

Introduction

Introduce the topic of the essay and give a preface to it by paraphrasing the topic. Clearly state which side of the discussion you are on and elaborate what can be expected in the subsequent sections.

Body paragraphs

Paragraph 1:

• Pauperized nations try and toil hard to make and base an economy for themselves by collating umpteen resources from all the possible sources out there. These nations have to work on their toes to get the chariot of economy to be efficacious.
• In such a scenario, when rich countries tantalise the labours from such nations, which they get on a cheaper investment, the underdeveloped and developing nations are denuded and ramshackled to a great extent.
• Adding to that, a poor country tries to provide its best of the amenities to its citizens with an aspiration of fungible contribution by them. Hence, ripping them apart by taking away the precipice of all the resources, i.e., the human resource, is extremely impertinent as an action by the rich nations.

Paragraph 2:

• The labours and skilled workers are available in abundance in the developed countries, however, to save certain alms the labours of the impecunious nations are induced to seek employment there. This, as per my belief, not only does an injustice to the poorer nations, but also to their own citizens
• Also, I believe this situation makes the difference between a poor and rich nation widened and ultimately become too gargantuan a difference to lift off and break it even for all the nations and ventures across the world.

Conclusion

Hence, it can be concluded that the practice of employing the workers from poor nations should be obliterated and condemned.

Sample Essay

The dichotomy of developing countries and developed countries have always been a point of endless debates over the years and one such ever-pervading argument is whether or not the developed nations should provide employment to the labours from poorer ones as some people consider the requirement of workers is more pronounced in the impoverished nations. I stand tall with this statement and in the forthcoming paragraphs, I shall put forth my thoughts on this alarming issue.

Pauperized nations try and toil hard to make and base an economy for themselves by collating umpteen resources from all the possible sources out there. These nations have to work on their toes to get the chariot of economy to be efficacious. In such a scenario, when rich countries tantalise the labours from such nations, which they get on a cheaper investment, the underdeveloped and developing nations are denuded and ramshackled to a great extent. Adding to that, a poor country tries to provide its best of the amenities to its citizens with an aspiration of fungible contribution by them. Hence, ripping them apart by taking away the precipice of all the resources, i.e., the human resource, is extremely impertinent as an action by the rich nations.

The labours and skilled workers are available in abundance in the developed countries. However, to save certain alms, the labours of the impecunious nations are induced to seek employment there. This, as per my belief, not only does an injustice to the poorer nations, but also to their own citizens, to elucidate, it is a very common sight to see when a citizen worth a certain amount of money for their job are spurned so as to employ someone from a poorer nation on a lower paycheque, which is immensely devious to humanity. Also, I believe this situation causes the difference between a poor and rich nation to widen and ultimately become too gargantuan a difference to lift off and break it even for all the nations and ventures across the world.

Though some might say that due to a paucity of job opportunities it is inexorable for the natives of penurious nations to take up jobs in the richer ones, abnegating this phenomenon would certainly improve the conditions of the developing and underdeveloped countries.

Hence, it can be concluded that the practice of employing the workers from poor nations should be obliterated and condemned.

Vocabulary

• Word: Dichotomy

Meaning: Difference between two things.
Sentence: The dichotomy of science and religion has been a debatable topic.

• Word: Pauperized

Meaning: Impoverished
Sentence: This nation is pauperised because of a nuclear war.

• Word: Toil

Meaning: To work hard
Sentence: “You need to toil hard in case you want to top the class”.

• Word: Collating

Meaning: Amass
Sentence: “Can you collate the woods for us?”

• Word: Umpteen

Meaning: A large amount
Sentence: “There are umpteen reasons for you to go on a trip”.

• Word: Tantalise

Meaning: torment or tease (someone) with the sight or promise of something that is unobtainable.
Sentence: The sales promises were tantalising.

• Word: Denude

Meaning: To rip apart
Sentence: They all have been denuded after the forest fire.

• Word: Ramshackle

Meaning: Broken down
Sentence: Look at that ramshackle mansion, which once was a sight of opulence and comely.

• Word: Impecunious

Meaning: Poverty-stricken
Sentence: This impecunious man has done a lot in his life.

• Word: Paucity

Meaning: Lack
Sentence: There was a paucity of eateries.