In Some Countries, a Few People Earn Extremely High Salaries – IELTS Writing Task 2
Updated On
Contents
In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country , while others believe the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Outline
Essay Type
This is a Discussion type essay.
Introduction
You are given a discussion essay for which you have to give an opinion. Begin by explaining in brief what you are going to cover in the body of your essay.
There is a large earning discrepancy among the top and bottom percentage of individuals in many nations. This is due to the fact that certain people at the top are making exorbitant salaries. Many people think that this is an unfair distribution of wages as those on the bottom are struggling to make ends meet.
Body
Paragraph 1: Some people believe that the government should ensure that money is spread equally across the country.
Paragraph 2: People work hard in order to earn high wages and afford the lifestyles they desire. This goal drives people to enhance their job quality so that they can be regarded as the top specialists in their professions.
Conclusion
Discuss both the sides and restate your opinion in clear and direct sentences.
Sample Essay
There is a large earning discrepancy among the top and bottom percentage of individuals in many nations. This is due to the fact that certain people at the top are making exorbitant salaries. Many people think that this is an unfair distribution of wages as those on the bottom are struggling to make ends meet. Therefore, they advocate that the government should set a salary ceiling. In my perspective, I don’t agree with this opinion, as a high income motivates people to work more. In the following paragraphs, I shall discuss both views and give reasons to support my opinion.
Primarily, some people believe that the government should ensure that money is spread equally across the country. It would enable governments to keep a close eye on people’s earning potential and avoid income disparities within the country. It would also narrow the difference between affluent and poor people, eventually eradicating poverty. By adhering to these rules, society will advance in a consistent manner, providing a fair opportunity for all.
Nevertheless, people work hard in order to earn high wages and afford the lifestyles they desire. This goal drives people to enhance their job quality so that they can be regarded as the top specialists in their professions. Additionally, it is only through the efforts of these individuals that the country develops into a well-developed nation. Because the money produced by those with high incomes is taxed and distributed throughout the country, individuals are highly dedicated to their work, which should be rewarded with good pay. Therefore, instead of preventing individuals from obtaining high incomes, the government should invest in education programs for the weaker class so that they may earn high salaries as well.
Overall, some people think that capping salaries is the best approach to preserve social homogeneity since it promotes equal opportunity for everybody. However, rather than stifling people’s desires to improve their standard of living, the government should implement a variety of educational initiatives.
Get Evaluated for FREE:
Do you have an essay on this topic? Please post it in the comments section. One of our IELTS trainers will evaluate your essay from an examiner’s point of view and reply to the comment. This service is completely FREE of cost.
Band 9 Sample Essay
Unlock Essay
Signup/login to unlock band 9 essay and ace the IELTS
Unequal economic distribution among the different sections of the population incites various sorts of repartee from people. While few consider that the gap between high salary and low earning is detrimental to the country, others speculate that the higher the income, the more progressive the nation will be. Therefore, in this discussion essay, both viewpoints will be taken into consideration to reach a final conclusion.
It is widely accepted that a bounteous emolument is always invigorating for any hard-working individual, especially an ambitious one. It is quid pro quo for the hard work and assiduous effort that the person puts in his/her work. As a result, high salaries are a stimulus for every human to keep on working. Secondly, high-salaried people can contribute to the burgeoning development of the country as the government works on the basic infrastructure like healthcare, housing, communication and commerce. For example, affluent people like Mukesh Ambani, Ratan Tata, Gautam Adani and others not only bestow economic support to the Indian economy but also create employment that aids a large section of the population of the country. Additionally, if the well-off earner is settled in a foreign country and invests in their native land, it is conducive to both nations. It is because it is increasing the national income of the country they live in through the taxes and offering more foreign revenue to their motherland.
Nevertheless, if the government imposes a limit on income, the economy may face certain consequences. Many people who are motivated to work for the money will lose interest in labouring with so little in return. The limitation on their income will also curb them to put in the cent percent effort, which might reduce the gross profit of the company. It will not only minimize the national income but also encourage people to migrate to foreign countries, welcoming them, aggravating the ‘brain drain’ situation. Moreover, honest people will tend to deviate from earning through honest means and also evade paying taxes for their own benefit.
Therefore, instead of controlling the modes of income and restraining high salaries, the government can counter this imbalance by levying a reasonable amount according to the income of an individual and validating that they pay it. It can also provide opportunities to the impoverished so that they can earn their livelihood and help in bridging the gap between rich and poor.
Vocabulary
- Discrepancy
Meaning: (noun) an illogical or surprising lack of compatibility or similarity between two or more facts.
Eg: This is some discrepancy between the credited amount and the amount in the database.
- Exorbitant
Meaning: (adjective) (of a price or amount charged) unreasonably high.
Eg: The prices of dresses in this store are exorbitant.
- Eradicating
Meaning: (verb) destroy completely; put an end to.
Eg: Scientists are constantly working to eradicate Covid-19 from the world.
- Ensure
Meaning: (verb) make certain that (something) will occur or be the case.
Eg: Eat healthy to ensure healthy living.
- Disparities
Meaning: (noun) a great difference.
Eg: Owing to disparities in the rates, people are suffering huge losses.
- Affluent
Meaning: (especially of a group or area) having a great deal of money; wealthy.
Eg: Spending lavishly is most common among affluent people.
- Dedicated
Meaning: (adjective) devoted to a task or purpose.
Eg: Sneha is a dedicated student.
- Prevent
Meaning: (verb) keep (something) from happening.
Eg: Speed breakers are installed to prevent vehicles from overspeeding.
- Homogeneity
Meaning: (noun) the quality or state of being all the same or all of the same kind.
Eg: Uniform promotes homogeneity.
- Stifling
Meaning: (adjective) making one feel constrained or oppressed.
Eg: The stifling heat was making Gina nauseous.
More Writing Task 2 Essay Topics
- Nowadays We are Producing More and More Rubbish
- The Use of Corporal Punishment in Schools Is In Decline, Yet it Should Be Used to Improve Behavior
- Sport is One of The Most Popular Draws on Television Today
- Some people Get Into Debt by Buying They Don’t Need and Can’t Afford
- Marketing and Promotion is The Key to a Successful Business
Practice IELTS Writing Task 2 based on Essay types
Explore other Discussion Essays
Janice Thompson
Janice Thompson
Post your Comments
2 Comments
Liu
Posted on Mar 20, 2022
Salary difference is a common phenomenon in every country. Some people consider it as reasonable, while others argue that the government should take action to reduce the imbalance. In my opinion, some policies are necessary for the well-being of most people.
The income imparity at a medium level is appropriate. On the one hand, some dangerous but indispensable occupations like soldiers or firefighters need a method to attract more candidates, and setting a high salary is the most efficient. Also some jobs like management and medical treatment require advanced skills and long work experience, so people in these positions took lots of effort on training and learning, thus they deserve higher salaries. On the other hand, higher income is a reward mechanism. It stimulates workers to actively improve their work. The usage of KPI as an income factor in many companies proves this argument.
However, extreme income imbalance ruins the whole country. First of all, it is undoubted that many people would suffer from low income if only a few people make lots of money. Lower class can’t save enough money for the tuition fee, so they don’t have an opportunity to compete for jobs that require higher education. Besides, they can’t pay for the mortgage so they have to rent a home. These issues limit their ability to seek higher salaries and strengthen social unfairness. In the worst case, the poor do not have enough income to survive, which leads to more riots and crimes.
In conclusion, I agree that the government should control salaries by setting proper income tax or low income cut-off. These policies not only restrict rich people to earn more, but also provide some funds for the government to help the weak.
Reply
kasturika
Posted on Mar 21, 2022
Band Score – 5
Concentrate on the correct usage of articles and punctuation.
Pay attention to spellings and sentence formation.
Use C2 level of words.