Insight Or Evolution? – IELTS Reading Answers

What do you do when you encounter an unfamiliar word or are confused between two options in the IELTS Reading test? Panic? Well, the best approach is to use context clues to figure it out, and the ideal way to master using context clues is by practicing passages from the best IELTS Reading books, like ‘Insight Or Evolution? IELTS Reading Answers’.

While going through this blog, you will solve the reading passage, check your answers against the provided Insight Or Evolution reading answers, explanations, and learn some IELTS exam preparation tips for band score of 8+ to help you become more comfortable handling unknown terms.

Passage for Insight Or Evolution? IELTS Reading Answers

Go through the passage for ‘Insight Or Evolution?’ Reading Answers given below and be prepared to solve similar IELTS Reading topics for General and Academic for the reading section.

Insight Or Evolution

Two scientists consider the origins of discoveries and other innovative behavior.

Scientific discovery is popularly believed to result from the sheer genius of such intellectual stars as naturalist Charles Darwin and theoretical physicist Albert Einstein. Our view of such unique contributions to science often disregards the person’s prior experience and the efforts of their lesser-known predecessors. Conventional wisdom also places great weight on insight in promoting breakthrough scientific achievements, as if ideas spontaneously pop into someone’s head – fully formed and functional.

There may be some limited truth to this view. However, we believe that it largely misrepresents the real nature of scientific discovery, as well as that of creativity and innovation in many other realms of human endeavor.

Setting aside such greats as Darwin and Einstein – whose monumental contributions are duly celebrated – we suggest that innovation is more a process of trial and error, where two steps forward may sometimes come with one step back, as well as one or more steps to the right or left. This evolutionary view of human innovation undermines the notion of creative genius and recognizes the cumulative nature of scientific progress.

Consider one unheralded scientist: John Nicholson, a mathematical physicist working in the 1910’s who postulated the existence of ‘proto-elements’ in outer space. By combining different numbers of weights of these proto-elements’ atoms, Nicholson could recover the weights of all the elements in the then-known periodic table. These successes are all the more noteworthy given the fact that Nicholson was wrong about the presence of proto-elements: they do not actually exist. Yet, amid his often fanciful theories and wild speculations, Nicholson also proposed a novel theory about the structure of atoms. Niels Bohr, the Nobel prize-winning father of modern atomic theory, jumped off from this interesting idea to conceive his now-famous model of the atom.

What are we to make of this story? One might simply conclude that science is a collective and cumulative enterprise. That may be true, but there may be a deeper insight to be gleaned. We propose that science is constantly evolving, much as species of animals do. In biological systems, organisms may display new characteristics that result from random genetic mutations. In the same way, random, arbitrary or accidental mutations of ideas may help pave the way for advances in science. If mutations prove beneficial, then the animal or the scientific theory will continue to thrive and perhaps reproduce.

Support for this evolutionary view of behavioral innovation comes from many domains. Consider one example of an influential innovation in US horseracing. The so-called ‘acey-deucy’ stirrup placement, in which the rider’s foot in his left stirrup is placed as much as 25 centimeters lower than the right, is believed to confer important speed advantages when turning on oval tracks. It was developed by a relatively unknown jockey named Jackie Westrope. Had Westrope conducted methodical investigations or examined extensive film records in a shrewd plan to outrun his rivals? Had he foreseen the speed advantage that would be conferred by riding acey-deucy? No. He suffered a leg injury, which left him unable to fully bend his left knee. His modification just happened to coincide with enhanced left-hand turning performance. This led to the rapid and widespread adoption of riding acey-deucy by many riders, a racing style which continues in today’s thoroughbred racing.

Plenty of other stories show that fresh advances can arise from error, misadventure, and also pure serendipity – a happy accident. For example, in the early 1970s, two employees of the company 3M each had a problem: Spencer Silver had a product – a glue which was only slightly sticky – and no use for it, while his colleague Art Fry was trying to figure out how to affix temporary bookmarks in his hymn book without damaging its pages. The solution to both these problems was the invention of the brilliantly simple yet phenomenally successful Post-It note. Such examples give lie to the claim that ingenious, designing minds are responsible for human creativity and invention. Far more banal and mechanical forces may be at work; forces that are fundamentally connected to the Laws of science.

The notions of insight, creativity and genius are often invoked, but they remain vague and of doubtful scientific utility, especially when one considers the diverse and enduring contributions of individuals such as Plato, Leonardo da Vinci, Shakespeare, Beethoven, Galileo, Newton, Kepler, Curie, Pasteur and Edison. These notions merely label rather than explain the evolution of human innovations. We need another approach, and there is a promising candidate.

The Law of Effect was advanced by psychologist Edward Thorndike in 1898, some 40 years after Charles Darwin published his groundbreaking work on biological evolution, On the Origin of Species. This simple law holds that organisms tend to repeat successful behaviors and to refrain from performing unsuccessful ones. Just like Darwin’s Law of Natural Selection, the Law of Effect involves an entirely mechanical process of variation and selection, without any end objective in sight.

Of course, the origin of human innovation demands much further study. In particular, the provenance of the raw material on which the Law of Effect operates is not as clearly known as that of the genetic mutations on which the Law of Natural Selection operates. The generation of novel ideas and behaviors may not be entirely random, but constrained by prior successes and failures – of the current individual (such as Bohr) or of predecessors (such as Nicholson).

The time seems right for abandoning the naive notions of intelligent design and genius, and for scientifically exploring the true origins of creative behaviour.

Questions for Insight Or Evolution? Reading Answers 

The Reading passage, ‘Insight Or Evolution?’ is an IELTS Academic Reading passage from Cambridge 17 Reading Test 2 Section 3. It consists of 14 questions and is a beneficial resource for those who is preparing for the reading test. 

The question types found in the ‘Insight Or Evolution?’ passage are:

• IELTS Reading Multiple-Choice Questions (Q. 1-5)
• IELTS Reading Yes, No, Not Given (Q. 6-10)
• IELTS Reading Summary Completion (Q. 11-14)

Now, set your timer and get ready to solve the Insight Or Evolution? questions.

Questions 1-5

1 The purpose of the first paragraph is to

A defend particular ideas.

B compare certain beliefs.

C disprove a widely held view.

D outline a common assumption.

2 What are the writers doing in the second paragraph?

A criticising an opinion

B justifying a standpoint

C explaining an approach

D supporting an argument

3 In the third paragraph, what do the writers suggest about Darwin and Einstein?

A They represent an exception to a general rule.

B Their way of working has been misunderstood.

C They are an ideal which others should aspire to.

D Their achievements deserve greater recognition.

4 John Nicholson is an example of a person whose idea

A established his reputation as an influential scientist.

B was only fully understood at a later point in history.

C laid the foundations for someone else’s breakthrough.

D initially met with scepticism from the scientific community.

5 What is the key point of interest about the ‘acey-deucy’ stirrup placement?

A the simple reason why it was invented

B the enthusiasm with which it was adopted

C the research that went into its development

D the cleverness of the person who first used it

Questions 6-10

6 Acknowledging people such as Plato or da Vinci as geniuses will help us understand the process by which great minds create new ideas.

7 The Law of Effect was discovered at a time when psychologists were seeking a scientific reason why creativity occurs.

8 The Law of Effect states that no planning is involved in the behaviour of organisms.

9 The Law of Effect sets out clear explanations about the sources of new ideas and behaviours.

10 Many scientists are now turning away from the notion of intelligent design and genius.

Questions 11-14

The origins of creative behaviour

The traditional view of scientific discovery is that breakthroughs happen when a single great mind has sudden 11.…………………………………… Although this can occur, it is not often the case. Advances are more likely to be the result of a longer process. In some cases, this process involves 12 …………………. , such as Nicholson’s theory about proto-elements. In others, simple necessity may provoke innovation, as with Westrope’s decision to modify the position of his riding stirrups. There is also often an element of 13……………………………………, for example, the coincidence of ideas that led to the invention of the Post-It note. With both the Law of Natural Selection and the Law of Effect, there may be no clear 14………………………………….. involved, but merely a process of variation and selection.

A invention

B goals

C compromise

D mistakes

E luck

F inspiration

G experiments

Insight Or Evolution? IELTS Reading Answers With Location and Explanation 

Read further for the explanations and location of the ‘Insight Or Evolution?’ IELTS reading answer and understand how to find out the correct answer to score a good IELTS band score.

1 Answer: D

Question type: Multiple-Choice Type

Answer Location: Paragraph 1, Line 6

Answer explanation: According to the first paragraph, common wisdom gives insight a lot of credit for advancing ground-breaking scientific discoveries. Like concepts just appear completely developed and usable out of thin air. Hence, the answer is D.

2 Answer: A

Question type: Multiple-Choice Type

Answer Location: Paragraph 1, Last line

Answer explanation: This paragraph portrays that there may be some limited truth to a particular view as mentioned. Nonetheless, the scientists believe that it largely misrepresents the real nature of scientific discovery. It also misinterprets creativity and innovation in many other domains of human efforts and ventures. Hence, the answer is A.

3 Answer: A

Question type: Multiple-Choice Type

Answer Location: Paragraph 3, Line 2-3

Answer explanation: The idea that creativity is more of a process of trial and error is mentioned in paragraph 3. One step back, as well as one or more steps to the right or left, might occasionally accompany two steps ahead. This evolutionary perspective on human invention rejects the idea of creative genius while recognising the cumulative nature of scientific advancement. Hence, the answer is A.

4 Answer: C

Question type: Multiple-Choice Type

Answer Location: Paragraph 4, Last line.

Answer explanation: John Nicholson proposed the existence of proto-elements in outer space, according to paragraph 4. Nicholson also implied a fresh hypothesis concerning the structure of atoms among his many imaginative notions and wild guesses. From this intriguing notion, Niels Bohr leapt to create his now-famous model of the atom. Hence, the answer is C.

5 Answer: A

Question type: Multiple-Choice Type

Answer Location: Paragraph 6, Line 9

Answer explanation: According to paragraph 6, the change just so occurred to correspond with improved left-hand turning performance. Due to this, many riders quickly and widely adopted riding acey-deucy, a racing style that is still used in thoroughbred racing today. Hence, the answer is A.

Tips for Answering the Question Types in the ‘Insight Or Evolution?’ IELTS Reading Passage

Given below are some IELTS Reading tips and techniques to increase your reading speed and help you answer the types of questions in the ‘Insight Or Evolution?’ Reading passage.

Multiple Choice Questions:

To solve MCQs in IELTS Reading, you need to understand the question and compare it to the paragraph in order to select the best solution from the available possibilities.

• Before reading the passage: Read the question and select the keywords. Check the keyword possibilities if the question statement is short on information.
• Using the keywords: Read the passage to find the relevant information.
• To select the correct option: Carefully read the relevant words and match them with each option.
• Elimination method: Try opting for this method to narrow down the options. And, find the best option by matching the meaning rather than just the keywords.

Yes/No/Not Given: 

Yes/No/Not Given questions are a type of IELTS Reading question that requires you to identify whether a statement is true, false, or not given in the passage. It is quite similar to the way you solve IELTS Reading True/False/Not Given questions.

• Yes statements are statements that are explicitly stated in the passage.
• No statements are statements that are explicitly contradicted in the passage.
• Not Given statements are statements that are neither explicitly stated nor contradicted in the passage

To answer Yes/No/Not Given questions, you need to be able to understand the passage and identify the key information. You also need to be able to distinguish between statements that are explicitly stated, contradicted, and not given.

Summary Completion:

Summary Completion is a type of IELTS reading question that requires you to fill in a gap in a sentence with a word or phrase from the passage. To answer these questions, you can use the following strategies:

• Read the sentence carefully: This will give you an idea of the type of word or phrase that is missing.
• Scan the passage for the keywords: The keywords in the sentence can help you to identify the correct word or phrase. Try to use the IELTS Reading keyword techniques to find them quickly.
• Read the sentence with the missing word or phrase: This will help you to see how the word or phrase fits into the sentence.
• Check your answer: Once you have filled in the gap, make sure that your answer makes sense in the context of the sentence.

Finally, with the IELTS Reading tips to tackle questions & unknown vocabulary and increase your reading speed, we officially come to the end of this blog. But you have to keep practicing with different IELTS Reading practice tests. In case you need guidance to ace the IELTS reading exam by improving your weak spots, join our free IELTS online demo and have a chat with an IELTS expert.

Useful Links:

• Animal Camouflage IELTS Reading Answers 
• A Penny That Saved a Life – IELTS Reading Answers
• What’s on Sydney, Pre-departure Checklist & Registering with a Doctor IELTS Reading Answers
• How Deserts are Formed IELTS Reading Answers
• Are These Two Reporters on the Same Planet IELTS Reading Answers