It is Generally Agreed that Society Benefits from the Work of its Members - IELTS Writing Task 2

Every society depends on the collective efforts of its members to progress and remain culturally and intellectually vibrant. Among these contributors, artists and scientists play particularly significant yet contrasting roles. The topic ‘It is Generally Agreed that Society Benefits from the Work of its Members’ challenges you to compare these contributions and evaluate which is more valued in modern society, making it ideal for testing analytical and evaluative writing skills in IELTS Writing Task 2.

This blog explores how to approach the essay topic ‘‘It is Generally Agreed that Society Benefits from the Work of its Members’, provides high-band sample responses, and provides you with a strong vocabulary to confidently write your own essay on the theme.

Essay Question for ‘It is Generally Agreed that Society Benefits from the Work of its Members’

Outline for IELTS Direct Question Essay

The provided outline will guide you to compose IELTS direct question essays, which will be beneficial in helping you improve your writing skills to achieve a band score of 7 or higher on the IELTS exam.

Sample Answers for It is Generally Agreed that Society Benefits from the Work of its Members IELTS Writing Task 2

Here are three IELTS Band 9 essay samples on the topic ‘It is Generally Agreed that Society Benefits from the Work of its Members’. You will be able to write your own essay and achieve a high grade with their help.

It is Generally Agreed that Society Benefits from the Work of its Members - Sample Answer 1

It is widely accepted that societies progress through the combined efforts of their members, each contributing in distinct yet meaningful ways. Among these contributors, artists and scientists occupy particularly influential positions, as their work shapes both how people live and how they think. While artists enrich societies culturally and emotionally, and scientists drive innovation and development, I believe that scientists are generally valued more highly in my society because of the direct and practical impact of their contributions on everyday life.

Artists play a crucial role in cultural enrichment and emotional expression. Through music, literature, painting, and cinema, they preserve cultural identity, raise social awareness, and encourage critical reflection on societal norms. Artistic works often capture historical moments and shared values, helping communities understand their past and question their present. For example, influential novels or films can highlight social injustice and inspire public debate by appealing to people’s emotions. In contrast, scientists contribute through technological and medical advancements that offer tangible benefits. Their research leads to innovations in healthcare, communication, and energy, while also driving economic growth and productivity. Scientific discoveries have transformed modern life, such as vaccines that prevent deadly diseases or digital technologies that connect people globally.

Although artists receive admiration and respect, scientific achievements tend to gain greater recognition and institutional support. Governments and industries prioritise science because it addresses urgent challenges and strengthens national development. This practical value reinforces my view that scientists are more highly valued.

In summary, artists uplift society culturally and emotionally, while scientists improve living standards through practical solutions. However, due to their immediate impact on health, technology, and economic progress, scientists are valued more highly in my society.

It is Generally Agreed that Society Benefits from the Work of its Members - Sample Answer 2

It is generally agreed that societal progress depends on the collective efforts of its members, each contributing in different yet complementary ways. Among the most influential contributors are artists and scientists, whose work shapes both the material conditions of life and the cultural values of society. Although artists and scientists play equally essential roles, my society tends to value scientists more highly because their contributions are closely linked to practical development and measurable outcomes.

Artists influence society by stimulating imagination, encouraging dialogue, and challenging conventional ways of thinking. Through literature, theatre, music, and visual art, they reflect social realities, preserve historical memory, and give a voice to marginalized communities. Artistic expression often raises awareness of injustice and promotes empathy by engaging people on an emotional level. For example, theatre and visual art have long been used to question inequality and inspire social reform. In contrast, scientists contribute through technological and medical advancements that have immediate and visible effects. Their research improves healthcare, boosts productivity, and drives economic growth. Scientific innovations, such as medical treatments or digital technologies, enhance the quality of life and strengthen national competitiveness. 

In my society, this difference in recognition suggests that practical outcomes are prioritised over cultural enrichment. Scientists often receive greater funding, public recognition, and social status. However, this imbalance does not reduce the importance of artists. A society that undervalues art risks losing creativity, empathy, and cultural continuity, resulting in progress that is efficient but emotionally shallow.

In conclusion, while artists enrich society culturally and emotionally, scientists are valued more highly in my society due to their direct impact on economic growth and everyday life. Nevertheless, both are essential for building a truly progressive and balanced society.

It is Generally Agreed that Society Benefits from the Work of its Members - Sample Answer 3

There is a consensus among people that society benefits from the individual work of its members. But, there is a difference of opinion as far as the input of the artists and scientists are concerned. I agree with the common consent that society is uplifted by many individual efforts. In this essay, we will discuss both the agreement and the differences in the contribution of the aforementioned groups of people.

Whether we consider artists or scientists, both these groups of people have their own share of bestowal to the society. There are many examples of how a lot of public welfare and/or charity drives were conducted by artists in their hometowns. Recently, for instance, with the break of Dharavi’s underground rap music, many artists and performers try to give back to the community by building schools, roads, clinics, etc. Mumbai’s Dharavi, the largest slum area in the world, got a distinct recognition due to this, which is another explanation as to how individual accolades and achievements benefit society in general. This has had a cascading effect that has reverberated throughout India, as musicians from every nook and corner are getting acknowledged, and then they further go on to help their localities. In general, the underground music of India has gained recognition in other countries as well, who now view the country through the lens of affinity.

Scientific advancement, on the other hand, affects the entire world positively. For example, successful genome sequencing of various COVID-19 strains has helped innumerable studies and researches. Scientists across all paradigms, for example, space exploration, have exerted their best for humanity as a whole. It is projected that humans will set foot on Mars by 2030, which is a monumental milestone. This is another case of how advancement in science and the unsung efforts of scientists often goes under the radar. Unfortunately, the brains aren’t as popular as the brauns, and scientists don’t often get as much recognition as musicians, artists and actors. Still, without them, our lives would be nowhere near today’s iterations.

To summarise, individuals more often than not try to give back to the society which nurtured them and helped mold them into the person they are. Their win is seen as the society’s win, their celebrations seen as the entire society’s celebration. For instance, when Neeraj Chopra secured India’s first track and field gold in the Tokyo Olympics, entire India rejoiced. Hence, both artists’ and scientists’ achievements are exemplary in their own regard and it is an individual’s win that benefits society in general.

Vocabulary to Use for It is Generally Agreed that Society Benefits from the Work of its Members - IELTS Writing Task 2

Below are some IELTS academic high-frequency vocabulary words related to the topic ‘It is Generally Agreed that Society Benefits from the Work of its Members’, that will help you boost your overall vocabulary and showcase your lexical resources.

To conclude, this IELTS Writing Task 2 topic highlights the importance of evaluating different forms of contribution to society. By comparing artists and scientists, candidates demonstrate their ability to analyze abstract ideas and social values. So, practice creating a well-structured response for recent IELTS topics in Writing Task 2 with balanced reasoning and precise vocabulary to show maturity of thought and strong academic writing skills.

Useful Links:

• Art and Culture & Technology - IELTS Writing Task 2
• Money is Important in Most People's Lives - IELTS Writing Task 2
• Creative Artist Should Always Be Given The Freedom to Express their Own Ideas – IELTS Writing Task 2
• Art is Considered an Essential Part of all Cultures Throughout the World – IELTS Writing Task 2
• The most important aim of science should be to improve people's lives - IELTS Writing Task 2 
• IELTS Writing Penalty for Word Count | Avoid Losing Marks