IELTS Writing Task 2 Topic: Young people who commit serious crimes

Updated On Sep 12, 2023

IELTS Writing Task 2 Topic: Young people who commit serious crimes

Contents

0.1 Get Evaluated for FREE:

1 Sample Essay:
- 1.1 Vocabulary :
2 Band 9 Sample Essay
- - 2.0.1 More Writing Task 2 Essay Topics

To prepare for the IELTS Essay writing task, you must polish your writing skills – including grammar, sentence structure, vocabulary and rhetoric. You can score well on the Essay writing task by practicing writing a different essay type daily. Below is a sample essay on the Essay Type: Opinion Essay. You can study the sample essay to begin writing your own answer on the given topic:

Some people believe that young people who commit serious crimes should be punished in the same way as adults. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Get Evaluated for FREE:

Do you have an essay on this topic? Please post it in the comments section. One of our IELTS trainers will evaluate your essay from an examiner’s point of view and reply to the comment. This service is completely FREE of cost.

Sample Essay:

There is an opinion that young offenders should be held accountable for their actions just as adults. While I find this view of some people justifiable to some extent, I also argue that treating both young and mature lawbreakers equally may have adverse effects.

On the one hand, I can understand why a young age should be no deterrent to dealing with criminals. If these juvenile delinquents were easily pardoned in place of receiving strict punishments as adults, they would not become fully aware of the serious consequences of their crimes. Therefore imposing appropriate punishments could prevent them from conducting illegal actions in the future. Besides, young perpetrators usually receive lighter sentences than they deserve, which is an injustice to the victims. In Vietnam, there was a well-known case in which a teenager murdered almost every member of a family deliberately, escaping the death sentence due to being a few months under the responsible age.

On the other hand, I am convinced that juvenile criminals should be tried in a different court from that for adults. Firstly, children are proven not to have sufficient intellectual or moral capacity to understand the outcomes of their misdeeds, so they lack the necessary conditions to be trial defendants as grown-up people. Secondly, when given a second chance, these underage convicts can have an opportunity to successfully rehabilitate and learn a valuable lesson. Thirdly, children can be negatively influenced by some bad role models, which should also be considered to give them a fair trial.

In conclusion, breakers of laws should not be spared of punishments, but I believe young offenders should be dealt with differently from adults.

Vocabulary :

Accountable: responsible for your decisions or actions and expected to explain them when you are asked
==>The state spends taxpayers’ money and should be held accountable.
Deterrent to something: a thing that makes somebody less likely to do something
==> There is no effective deterrent for these young criminals.
Perpetrator: a person who commits a crime or does something that is wrong or evil
==>We will do everything in our power to bring the perpetrators to justice.
Deliberately: done in a way that was planned, not by chance
==>I suspected that he was being deliberately ambiguous.
juvenile criminals: a criminal who is under 19
==> Finding ways to deal with juvenile criminals is a perplexing problem.

Band 9 Sample Essay

In the wake of perpetrations and solemn offences which have only been exacerbated in the past few years, the contention of young people being prosecuted at par with adult criminals has been prevalent. Some opine in the support of equal punishment for all while some hold the viewpoint of tackling the two segments distinctively. I find myself agreeing with the latter standpoint and in the forthcoming sections of this essay, I shall be elucidating the same.

People who argue that everyone should be charged with equal punishment, principally state that for equal crime, the prosecution has to be equivalent. However, for the young and undernourished mindsets that would be too extreme to execute. The juveniles who misdemeanour are not concrete and matured enough to distinguish between right and wrong. They majorly culminate in committing a serious offence influenced by what they perceive from their surroundings and hence discernment and prudence of judging often don’t get contoured to their maximum capacity in their case. Hence, prosecuting them equally as adult criminals and misdoers shall not be apposite.

The fragile and gullible adolescents if treated commensurately as adults, shall curb their development and ravaging all the scope of them treading in the right direction. Subjecting juveniles in a strict trial will not only deprive them of their chance and possibility to ameliorate but it may imperil them into adapting a personality that could be immensely diabolical in the later stages of their lives. Bestowing a mild laxity in the case of juvenile delinquency could treat them for their offences and hence letting them know the dire consequences of such peccadillos without being harsh on them that might defeat the whole process of their refinement.

Although people of a younger age could use it as a loop to evade the repercussions of the misdeeds, a threat of possibility couldn’t nullify the factual facet of their deterioration otherwise.

In conclusion, it could thus be argued that punishing everyone with an equal intensity under a similar set of charges could denude the frangible personalities of young people.