Classifying Societies - IELTS Reading Answers With Location

Haniya Yashfeen

8 min read

Updated On Feb 13, 2026

Try the ‘Classifying Societies' IELTS Reading Answers practice test to boost your reading accuracy and confidence. Find out the detailed answer explanations along with their locations and learn our expert techniques to help you reach a Band 9!

Classifying Societies - IELTS Reading Answers With Location

Types of Questions in the “Classifying Societies” IELTS Reading Passage
Reading Passage
Classifying Societies
Classifying Societies IELTS Reading Answers With Explanation

5 Most Recent IELTS Reading Practice Tests

If you are someone preparing for the IELTS Academic Reading exam, sometimes it can feel overwhelming, mainly when you are about to crack passages like “Classifying Societies.”

This particular text has previously appeared in an IELTS exam and expects you to understand the passage well and answer tricky question types! If you are aiming for a band 8 or higher, this article, based on the “Classifying Societies”, will help you understand the passage perfectly and approach each question type with a concentrated strategy.

Types of Questions in the “Classifying Societies” IELTS Reading Passage

The question types found in Classifying Societies IELTS Reading Answers are:

IELTS Reading True False Not Given [Q.1 – Q.7]
IELTS Reading Short Answer Questions [Q.8 – Q.13]

Reading Passage

Classifying Societies

You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 1-13, which are based on the Reading Passage below.

Although humans have established many types of societies throughout history, sociologists and anthropologists tend to classify different societies according to the degree to which different groups within a society have unequal access to advantages such as resources, prestige or power, and usually refer to four basic types of societies. From least to most socially Complex they are clans, tribes, chiefdoms and states.

Clan
These are small-scale societies of hunters and gatherers, generally of fewer than 100 people, who move seasonally to exploit wild (undomesticated) food resources. Most surviving hunter-gatherer groups are of this kind, such as the Hadza of Tanzania or the San of southern Africa. Clan members are generally kinsfolk, related by descent or marriage. Clans lack formal leaders, so there are no marked economic differences or disparities in status among their members.

Because clans are composed of mobile groups of hunter-gatherers, their sites consist mainly of seasonally occupied camps and other smaller and more specialised sites. Among the latter are kill or butchery sites - locations where large mammals are killed and sometimes butchered - and work sites, where tools are made or other specific activities carried out. The base camp of such a group may give evidence of rather insubstantial dwellings or temporary shelters, along with the debris of residential occupation.

Tribe
These are generally larger than mobile hunter-gatherer groups, but rarely number more than a few thousand, and their diet or subsistence is based largely on cultivated plants and domesticated animals. Typically, they are settled farmers, but they may be nomadic with a very different, mobile economy based on the intensive exploitation of livestock. These are generally multi-community societies, with the individual communities integrated into the larger society through kinship ties. Although some tribes have officials and even a “capital” or seat of government, such officials lack the economic base necessary for effective use of power.

The typical settlement pattern for tribes is one of settled agricultural homesteads or villages. Characteristically, no one settlement dominates any of the others in the region. Instead, the archaeologist finds evidence for isolated, permanently occupied houses or for permanent villages. Such villages may be made up of a collection of free-standing houses, like those of the first farms of the Danube valley in Europe. Or they may be clusters of buildings grouped together, for example, the pueblos of the American Southwest, and the early farming village or small town of Ҫatalhöyük in modern Turkey.

Chiefdom
These operate on the principle of ranking—differences in social status between people. Different lineages (a lineage is a group claiming descent from a common ancestor) are graded on a scale of prestige, and the senior lineage, and hence the society as a whole, is governed by a chief. Prestige and rank are determined by how closely related one is to the chief, and there is no true stratification into classes. The role of the chief is crucial.

Often, there is local specialisation in craft products, and surpluses of these and of foodstuffs are periodically paid as obligation to the chief. He uses these to maintain his retainers, and may use them for redistribution to his subjects. The chiefdom generally has a center of power, often with temples, residences of the chief and his retainers, and craft specialists. Chiefdoms vary greatly in size, but the range is generally between about 5000 and 20,000 persons.

Early State
These preserve many of the features of chiefdoms, but the ruler (perhaps a king or sometimes a queen) has explicit authority to establish laws and also to enforce them by the use of a standing army. Society no longer depends totally upon kin relationships: it is now stratified into different classes. Agricultural workers and the poorer urban dwellers form the lowest classes, with the craft specialists above, and the priests and kinsfolk of the ruler higher still. The functions of the ruler are often separated from those of the priest: palace is distinguished from temple. The society is viewed as a territory owned by the ruling lineage and populated by tenants who have an obligation to pay taxes. The central capital houses a bureaucratic administration of officials; one of their principal purposes is to collect revenue (often in the form of taxes and tolls) and distribute it to government, army and craft specialists. Many early states developed complex redistribution systems to support these essential services.

This rather simple social typology, set out by Elman Service and elaborated by William Sanders and Joseph Marino, can be criticised, and it should not be used unthinkingly. Nevertheless, if we are seeking to talk about early societies, we must use words and hence concepts to do so. Service’s categories provide a good framework to help organise our thoughts.

Classifying Societies IELTS Reading Answers With Explanation

To have a well-rounded preparation and achieve a better IELTS band score, you need to find out the areas you need to improve after solving the reading passage. Therefore, check the answers of Classifying Societies Reading Answers given below along with the location and explanation for each answer.

1 Answer: TRUE