It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment Sample Essays
Updated On
Contents
Given below is a real IELTS Writing Part 2 Essay question. We have provided sample essays as well as an essay outline so that you can practice writing your own!
Check out more IELTS Advantages and Disadvantages Essays!
Read the sample essay for It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Sample Essay 1
As technology has developed, people can now travel to remote natural areas. While this trend is beneficial to some extent, I would argue that its disadvantages are more significant.
On the one hand, visiting isolated natural places has some benefits. Firstly, this is a newer and more interesting type of travelling. Since going to other cities or countries has been too common for most people, it might be more exciting for them to explore new places such as the South Pole or the Amazon rainforest. This gives them valuable experiences and unforgettable memories. Secondly, when visiting remote areas, people, especially scientists, might acquire more knowledge about the natural habitat. For example, when coming to the North Pole, scientists can learn about the life of polar bears which live far away from humans.
On the other hand, I believe this development has far more drawbacks. The first one is that travelling to remote natural areas can be risky if the travellers are not sufficiently prepared. For instance, the temperature at the South Pole is usually very low, which adversely affects people’s health. Travelling to forests can also be dangerous as people have to face the risk of being attacked by animals. Also, since visiting isolated places often requires a large amount of investment in researching and ensuring the safety of travellers, the costs of travelling tend to be high. Therefore, it seems like only scientists and rich people can afford this activity, so this development is likely to benefit only a small group of individuals.
In conclusion, I believe the disadvantages of people being able to travel to remote areas outweigh its advantages.
Useful Vocabulary & Expressions:
- isolated: far away from any others ==>isolated rural areas
- common: happening often, existing in large numbers or in many places ==>Jackson is a common English name.
- adverse: negative and unpleasant==> Lack of money will have an adverse effect on our research program.
- ensure: to make sure that something happens or is definite ==>The book ensured his success.
Sample Essay 2
It is true that humans can now set foot in wild regions far away from civilisation. While I accept that this development can have certain benefits for the human race, I believe that it is likely to have a harmful impact on nature.
On the one hand, undertaking expeditions to the wilderness can be valuable in terms of both science and recreation. There are a considerable number of undiscovered secrets that can be tremendously useful for researchers to conduct their studies. For instance, environmental scientists can analyse the data about the thickness of ice layers over millions of years in both hemispheres to predict the possible changes in global temperatures. Such findings are crucial for the governments to develop appropriate plans to alleviate global warming. Furthermore, the untouched beauty of these areas is usually appealing to travellers, providing people with an attractive option of holiday destination or excursion.
However, I would argue that these positive aspects are outweighed by the drawbacks. When people are given full and easy access to the distant and unpopulated areas, there are likely to be more moving there to reside or start their business. It has been shown that substantial damage has been done to nature such as massive deforestation or water contamination due to humans’ lack of environmental awareness. If there is inadequate protection of the environment from this type of action, wild regions in the world will no longer exist, unspeakably affecting not only the overall ecology but also the lives of other people.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the potential dangers of travelling to wild environments are more significant than the possible benefits for the mentioned reasons.
Useful Expressions:
- Appealing (adj): attractive or interesting ==>Overseas students who are offered an appealing salary and position in a foreign company are usually unable to resist the offer and choose to remain in the country instead of returning to their native land.
- Distant (adj): far away ==>The application of technology in the form of electric household appliances has facilitate the enjoyment of people’s life to a great extent..
- Unpopulated (adj): having no inhabitants
- Reside (v): to live, have your home, or stay in a place ==>The huge waves of immigrants from poorer countries flocking to wealthier nations can threaten to take the jobs of those who have resided in their countries for a long time by accepting to work for a much lower pay.
- Substantial (adj): large in size, value or importance ==>By respecting the substantial differences between the older and the younger generations, the mutual understanding between them can be greatly enhanced.
- Massive deforestation (noun phrase): the destruction of forests by people on a large scale ==>Massive deforestation is largely attributable to massive deforestation because there are not enough trees to help to hold the flood water.
- Contamination (n): the action of making something less pure or poisonous. ==>In many rural villages in China and Vietnam, the supply of underground water which has been in use for hundreds of years is now incapable of meeting the growing demand of the expanding population, threatening the health of the people with using water which has not been tested for contamination.
- Environmental awareness (noun phrase): the understanding that the environment needs to be protected (ý thức bảo vệ môi trường). Ví dụ: The first step to environmental protection is concerned with raising the environmental awareness of individuals.
- Ecology (n): the relationships between the air, land, water, animals, etc ==>Oil spills cause terrible damage to the fragile ecology of the sea.
Do you have an essay on this topic? Please post it in the comments section. One of our IELTS trainers will evaluate your essay from an examiner’s point of view and reply to the comment.
More IELTS Writing Task 2 essays
- Every year several languages die out
- Some People Think That Parents Should Teach Children How to be Good Members of Society
- Happiness is considered very important in life
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing
- Young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school
- Research Indicates That the Characteristics We are Born With Have Much More Influence On Our Personality
Also Check :
Practice IELTS Writing Task 2 based on Essay types
Explore other Writing Actual Tests
Recent Articles


Courtney Miller
Post your Comments
14 Comments
Ogungbangbe Gbonjubola
Posted on Jun 3, 2022
Exploration to normally remote areas, such as the south pole, is now seen as a plausible reality for both scientists and tourists. However, there are pros and cons to these kinds of activities. I believe, however, that the disadvantages are greater than the advantages.
Being able to travel and explore a new environment definitely has it’s benefits. One of these involves the chance of a new scientific discovery. Places like these can be seen as beehive of new information learned from plants and animals unknown to mankind and can open up doors of knowledge about new drugs and cures for diseases. It could be a breakthrough in the world of research. Another reason is the chance for the common folks to learn new things about the world. It gives opportunities for the expansion of knowledge into nature and can even be seen as a form of excursion for kids. For example, I still remember how fun it was to visit an old landmark in my country when I was a child and that memory is still stuck with me
That being said, these advantages do not negate the fact that opening up isolated areas could lead to destruction of exotic species only known to that area. The “invasion” of some of these places could lead to the extinction of plants and even animals due to exposure to diseases we carry. Speaking of animals, there could be wildlife that are more dangerous than we can handle (mammals that are unknown and reptiles that could be poisonous). In this case, we may not have cures suitable enough to help the injured.
To sum up, while the possibility of learning about another part of out earth might seem fascinating, the dangers it poses may be above the benefits gained,
Reply
kasturika
Posted on Jun 4, 2022
Band Score – 6
Concentrate on the correct usage of articles, prepositions, verb form and punctuation.
Use C2 level of words and appropriate linkers.
chiedza
Posted on Feb 25, 2022
owing to the advancements in technology ,vacations and research trips to the rural enviroments ,escpecially those located in the south pole have become common.evidently ,this phenomenon has more demerits than merits,and thus ,this essay will elaborate on the topic and justify these views.
on one hand,hinterlands are rich in cultures,traditions and even languages .this makes them the perfect grounds for research work.moreover,they offer a varriety of undiscovered enviroments,ecosystems and animal species.this gives researchers more content to exploit .in addition,these enviroments have not yet been affected by excessive human behaviors that lead to enviromental degradation,therefore they are very authentic.this inturn means that,scientist can get first hand information that is unbiased.
on the other hand,this circumstance puts these formerly inaccessible areas at risk,especially those that are human induced.in the past ,the natives of these regions could preserve their natural habitats without any foreign intrusion.nonetheless ,with the ease of movement nowadays,there is a possible threat of invasion of their privacy.the value of their cultures will soon diminish ,and they can even lose their native languages in the long run,as they will be trying to adapt to the international ways of communication.additionally,there will be substantial degradation of the enviroment and pollution of all forms,due to the increased inflow of outsiders.poaching of the rare,endangered species will also become inevitable as more people with hidden agendas will be able to access these areas.
in conclusion,there is no doubt that the effects brought up by this phenomenon are not entirely positive or negative .nonetheless,the drawbacks outweigh the benefits.
Reply
Zahid Iqbal
Posted on Oct 25, 2021
Transit to distant natural habitat is achievable by researchers and travelers at the moment, for instance, the South Pole. While there are considerable merits to this advancement, I believe the drawbacks are ubiquitous.
To begin with, there are endless possibilities of exploration of the uncharted. With the help of 21st century technological advancements, the scientists and explorers can uncover the hidden mysteries which will help them iron out the complexities of modern era. For instance, what if they find a bacteria or virus which can be modified to invent a cure for HIV or Cancer?. Besides, deep exploration can lead to not only a cure but it can help reveal a plethora of undiscovered species. Moreover, natural minerals and materials can be discovered by delving deep into the earth.
Secondly, such whimsical environment can contain some major demerits. Safety is the biggest concern for the scientists and travelers. If the surroundings are toxic and hazardous, it can put them in harm’s way. For instance, volcanic eruptions, emission of methane gas, acid rain and so on.
Apart from that, even if they managed to reach the forbidden door, there is no guarantee they will not unintentionally harm the nature. Because of the voracious nature of human, It is evident that substantial damage has been done to nature, such as massive deforestation or water contamination due to mankind’s lack of environmental awareness.
To summarize, due to the obscure involvement of risks are far greater than the safety, I believe the hindrance are more significant than the possible benefits for the mentioned reasons.
Reply
Janice Thompson
Posted on Oct 25, 2021
Overall band: 5.0
Cohesion: Learn the use of cohesive devices. Concentrate on the linkers of contrast.
Collocations: Learn when to use “human” and “man”
Learn contextual vocabulary: The word “Hindrance” used in the conclusion is not the right word there
Azmira Zaman
Posted on Sep 11, 2021
Advances in transportation technology have resulted in easier access to isolated places like the South Pole, but this has a knock-on effect on the environment with many environmentalists struggling to cope with the problem. Despite the drawbacks of this development, there are some advantages as well. This essay outlines the perceived drawbacks and benefits of increased travel to remote places and explains why there are far more significant disadvantages.
The biggest advantage of this problem is that scientists can make new discoveries about microbes and other species of animals and plants. The lack of proper transportation deters researchers from examining the various forms of life available in those countries. For instance, in recent times a variety of new microorganisms and their characteristics have been discovered as opposed to the past. Such findings are crucial for the development of science. Thus the more accessibility to these places, the more growth in the different fields of biology.
Despite this, however, the disadvantage of loss of biodiversity can not be overlooked. Whenever more and more people visit these locations, some areas have to be developed to provide accommodations for them. Any development requires some interference with nature which comes at the cost of it. For example, there may be damage to the natural flora and fauna. Moreover, with more humans in an area, more resources would be required, resulting in the depletion of natural resources. The more popular these regions become, the more adverse effects it has on the environment.
To conclude, the increase in travel to remote areas leads to advancements in science. Nevertheless, the fact that it can be detrimental to the environment can not be ignored. Therefore, the disadvantages outweigh the advantages.
Reply
abhinav
Posted on Aug 29, 2021
With advancements in technology, researchers and explorers can now travel to remote natural environment like the South Pole. I feel exploring the South Pole has more benefits than drawbacks.
For one, scientists will get a chance to conduct research on this untouched land. For instance, they can conduct research on penguins, polar bears, walruses and whales. Moreover, they can do experiments to reverse the rise in global temperature which will be a plus point for mankind. Additionally, visitors can experience extreme adventures that the South Pole has to offer. Hence, there are a lot of advantages in visiting the South Pole.
However, along with numerous advantages there are some disadvantages as well. Firstly, presence of humans will degrade the natural environment of the South Pole. People change their surrounding to their own convenience which adversely affects the environment. For example, when visitors were first allowed in the Amazon Forest for jungle safari, they left plastic bags and bottles there. Secondly, in the South Pole basic amenities are not available. People will have to be prepared for all the mishappenings that nature will throw at them. Finally, as temperature there is well below 0 degrees, travelers can face serious health problems even if they take extreme precautions.
The above look illustrates that though there are a few demerits in exploring the South Pole, the merits outweigh them. The research potential and the experience that South pole provides to scientist and tourists shadows the drawbacks that comes with it. Hence, it is worth exploring the south pole.
Reply
Janice Thompson
Posted on Sep 1, 2021
Overall band: 5.5
Grammatical Range: Work on grammatical numbers and prepositions
Lexical resource: Try to use complex vocabulary
Irfan Noor K
Posted on Aug 26, 2021
People always wanted to explore the untouched and uncharted territories of the South pole, but it was not possible until now. The remote natural environment of the region can possibly be visited by the researcher and general public alike. This essay will argue that despite, the vital information which would be provided by the scientists for the world by studying the south pole, there is a great chance that the continent would suffer due to tourist activities.
If scientists could study the glaciers in the South pole then they would be able to understand the effect of global warming on the rest of the world and would prevent the damage. Although it is hard to contemplate whether human activities have any effect on unexplored regions of the globe or not, nobody would know that unless the researches are conducted on those areas. For instance, if the glaciers are melting significantly then there is a high chance that the world is beyond saving and we are too late to right our wrongdoings, but if they haven’t been affected yet then the scientist could come up with a solution just in time.
On the other hand, tourists had done more harm to any tourists attractions than good; therefore, it is reasonable to state that their activities in the south pole would only harm its natural environment rather than preserve it. Tourists mostly visit places in their leisure while carrying many products for their pleasure, such as plastic bottles which are one of the biggest reasons for pollutions and could create greenhouse gasses after being burnt. Hence, human interactions with nature could cause damage to the environment which would be problematic for every living thing in this world.
People are naturally attracted to places they have never been to and the south pole is no exception in that regard; Although, scientists could provide life-saving information to the world but, the process could open the door for everyone and people can spoil nature for their pleasure rather than knowledge. in my opinion, the advantages can help humanity whereas the price to achieve that is much higher; hence, it is much efficient that the south pole should only be traveled by the scientists.
Reply
Janice Thompson
Posted on Sep 1, 2021
Overall band: 6.5
Work on improving your vocabulary.
Reza Eslami
Posted on Aug 16, 2021
Due to technology development, people are able to travel to remote destinations such as the arctic. While this trend is beneficial to some extent, in this essay, I would argue that its drawbacks outweigh the advantages. This essay will first demonstrate that touching such isolated places with tourist may change their ecosystems very quickly, followed by a discussion of how entering the scientist would lead to increasing the knowledge of environmental researchers.
On the one hand, visiting remote natural places has some benefits. Firstly, when scientists visit such intact places, they can acquire more knowledge about the natural habitat . For example, researchers are able to learn more about polar bears by going to the North Pole. Scientists can also search about the plants growing in very cold weather and improve their information in this regard. Secondly, visiting the new isolated places such as the Arctic and Antarctic is very attractive for tourists. This gives them valuable experience and unforgettable memories.
On the other hand, I believe that this possibility has far more drawbacks. The main one is that traveling to unexplored regions is considered as a danger to such places, for they need accommodation, food and transportation which result in soil and air pollution. Unfortunately, bulk of studies have showed human change surrounding ecosystem in favour of their benefits, in other words they are not kind to their natural environment.
In conclusion, traveling to remote destinations can be advantageous for scientists, however, disadvantages regarding environmental preservation outweigh and are more important.
Reply
Janice Thompson
Posted on Aug 17, 2021
Overall band : 6.0
Concentrate on Grammatical Range and Accuracy, especially tenses, grammatical numbers and the use of articles.
Rashad Gayibkhanov
Posted on Mar 20, 2017
Nowadays, the opportunity has become available for tourists and scientists to travel to distant natural areas. In my opinion, I tend to believe that travelling these areas can bring about more problems compared to advantages it might bring.
One the one hand, travelling to remote natural areas has some benefits. Firstly, scientists and tourists can discover new things about nature. Since the South Pole has not been completely discovered due to its climate, it provides an opportunity for scientists to learn interesting things about its environment. For example, a different sky vision can be seen only in south pole which many tourists and scientists are willing to see. Availability of such opportunity for tourists and scientists is a good experience. Secondly, being able to travel to remote areas tourists can experience life in different conditions. In other words, the temperature in the south pole is usually cold and having an adventure under extreme conditions is a great experience for some people.
On the other hand, despite the advantages above, I believe people could face serious drawbacks from travelling those areas. One potentially dangerous problem is that the temperature of the south pole is usually below -10 degrees, and that would probably create some possible serious health risks for scientists and tourists. Making a decision to travel isolated areas with low temperature will probably put tourists and scientists into a big trouble. Another evident issue is that, many vehicles such as helicopters and their communications systems have failed to work in such areas. This would probably bring about life-threatening situations if not prepared beforehand.
In conclusion, despite some benefits of travelling to isolated natural areas, I tend to believe that the disadvantages of travelling isolated areas far outweigh the advantages.
Reply
Janice Thompson
Posted on Aug 17, 2021
Overall band : 6.0
The words scientists and tourists are repeated many times in the essay. Try using different words.
Work on Grammatical Range and accuracy – especially prepositions