IELTS Writing Task 2 Topic: Dangerous Sports
Updated On
Contents
Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports, while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Get Evaluated for FREE:
Do you have an essay on this topic? Please post it in the comments section. One of our IELTS trainers will evaluate your essay from an examiner’s point of view and reply to the comment. This service is completely FREE of cost.
Outline
Essay type
Discussion essay
Introduction
- Paraphrase the topic of the discussion.
- Give a clear insight into the gist of the essay and what one could expect from the same.
Body
- Paragraph 1- Advocates of banning certain sports may argue that their inherently dangerous nature may threaten lives. As extreme conditions are a prerequisite for these sports, risks like equipment failure render players more vulnerable than in other sports.
- Paragraph 2- , I believe that people should have the autonomy to play any sports they want, regardless of their danger. This is because they can already decide for themselves whether to take part in several dangerous non-sport activities. If personal freedom is championed with regard to things like alcohol, one can argue that it should be extended to sporting pursuits as well. Instead of an outright ban on extreme sports, I believe there are ways to mitigate the risks attached to them. Sports associations could impose an age limit for extreme athletes to ensure only people who are fully developed physically are allowed to participate.
Conclusion
Conclude the essay by providing an inference made from the essay.
Sample Essay
It is a common belief that we should strictly prohibit extreme sports due to the huge number of risks involved. In this essay, I am going to demonstrate that risk factors are present in all sports before suggesting that people should have the right to play any sports they want.
IELTS Writing (General) Actual Tests eBook Combo (July - October 2022) [Task 1+ Task 2]
4.8 of 89 Reviews
Written by professional IELTS teachers to help candidates on the big day
Written by professional IELTS teachers to help candidates on the big day
Advocates of banning certain sports may argue that their inherently dangerous nature may threaten lives. As extreme conditions are a prerequisite for these sports, risks like equipment failure render players more vulnerable than in other sports. For example, skydivers who freefall from enormous altitudes seem more prone to injuries or even death than players of ordinary sports. It not only imperils the lives of the people undergoing the severities post such injuries or mishappenings but also curbs one’s harmony as at times, the players may be rendered distraught and traumatized for life. This, as they say, is a clear lack of prudence and safety measures for the people participating in such sports.
In contrast, I believe that people should have the autonomy to play any sports they want, regardless of their danger. This is because they can already decide for themselves whether to take part in several dangerous non-sport activities. For example, those who reach the legal drinking age are free to purchase alcohol, the excessive consumption of which may have fatal consequences. If personal freedom is championed with regard to things like alcohol, one can argue that it should be extended to sporting pursuits as well. Instead of an outright ban on extreme sports, I believe there are ways to mitigate the risks attached to them. Sports associations could impose an age limit for extreme athletes to ensure only people who are fully developed physically are allowed to participate. Another solution is to bar players from practising or competing without the necessary protective gear. These measures would strike a happy medium without intruding on people’s personal freedom.
In conclusion, I believe people are entitled to play dangerous sports if they want, and certain restrictions in lieu of a ban would help ease the safety concerns.
Band 9 Sample Essay
Unlock Essay
Signup/login to unlock band 9 essay and ace the IELTS
The media commonly provides a barrage of news about dangerous sports as the deaths and injuries associated with them often make for spectacular headlines. As a result, some people have argued that all extreme sports should be banned, although I would argue that such a policy would be out of all proportion to the real risks involved.
Those in favour of prohibiting people from taking part in dangerous sports tend to focus on the risk element. Even when individuals may be physically and mentally prepared to participate in extreme sports activities, and even when they have all the right gear, the dangers are potentially existing. To take an example, some sports are challenging and fraught with danger as BASE jumping. Participants hurl themselves off cliffs, and few escape without suffering severe bruising or acute abdominal pains, which normally last for several days. In addition, although sports equipment rarely malfunctions, this may still happen and the consequences may be fatal. The supporters of legislation to ban dangerous sports argue that such tragic outcomes not only affect the individual victims, but also leave mental scars that their families then have to live with for the rest of their lives.
However, I support the view of those who contend that participation in extreme sports must be a matter of personal choice. Firstly, overcoming physical challenges may be a springboard for positive personal transformation. It may make a person stronger and more determined, and the experience may be a life-changing one. Secondly, the rigours of preparation in order to go mountain-climbing, white-water rafting or other such extremely strenuous activities demand that an individual is in the peak of health and physical condition. Finally, there is an ethical aspect that dictates that a person should have the freedom to pursue the challenges which they set themselves, even though this may involve a level of risk which others might find unacceptable.
In conclusion, while acknowledging the real risks, I would defend the right of any individual to take part in the extreme sport of their choice.
More Writing Task 2 Essay Topics
- Some People Think That Old Buildings Should Be Knocked Down And Give Way To Modern Buildings
- Celebrities Earn More Money Than Other Professionals Is This Justified
- In Some Countries At Secondary Or High School There May Be Two Streams Of Study
- The Planet’s Population Is Reaching Unsustainable Levels
- International Sporting Occasions Are Essential In Easing International Tensions
Also check :
- IELTS Writing Task 2
- Tips to write introduction in IELTS Writing Task 2
- Tips to write great writing essay
- IELTS Sample essays
- IELTS Writing task 2 Tips
- IELTS Writing tips
- How to get band 8 in IELTS Writing Task 2
- IELTS Writing recent actual test
- Band 9 essays
- Advantage and Disadvantage Essays
- IELTS Writing Answer sheet
- IELTS map vocabulary
- IELTS Writing Task 1 Connectors
Practice IELTS Writing Task 2 based on Essay types
Explore other Writing Task 2 Actual Tests
Courtney Miller
Post your Comments
1 Comment
June
Posted on Dec 1, 2021
While some people endorse the idea that highly risky sports should be prohibited by the government, I disagree with this position and support the opposite party that praises freedom over security.
Proponents of banning dangerous sporty activities might state that this would significantly affect the well-being of our society and environment. Firstly, their approach would protect the sportspeople from injuries and — in the worst case — death. Secondly, bypassers would be protected, especially when it comes to forms of sport that are performed in a public area and pose a constant risk for people staying there. Lastly, forbidding dangerous sports that take place in nature, like rock climbing, could help to reduce damages on flora and fauna.
Whereas these alleged outcomes sound promising at first sight, no prove can be furnished that illegalizing these sports would actually lead to people ceasing them. It is more probable, that they would continue practicing their hobby furtively. This will not lessen but increase the danger of their activities due to the lack of proper supervision. Furthermore, this question bears an ethical aspect, since we live in a highly individualized society, where personal freedom is a much valued moral concept. Therefore, implementing the suggested restraint would contradict our modern ideals. For these reasons suppressing specific sports completely is not an option, but it should be considered to set stricter regulations to them, comparable to the laws on the acquisition and use of weapons. Conceivable restrictions may be a specific training or license compulsory for exercising in this field.
To conclude, even if there are arguments for a comprehensive interdiction of sports which are highly risky, they can not outweigh the disadvantages. Instead of banning these sports it would be more effective to impose some conditions on their practice.
Reply