Many Old Buildings Protected by Law are Part of a Nation’s History - IELTS Writing Task 2

Writing an IELTS Agree Disagree essay can be really tricky because it is not just about writing your opinion but also proving that it is right with a proper structure and understandable examples. Most students tend to struggle with balancing both sides of the argument with ‘to what extent' questions, or to keep focused on one opinion throughout their essay. 

Most importantly, finishing the IELTS Writing Task 2 within the given time frame is a must, and that is why finding the best approach to writing each question type is the key to a higher band score! In this article, we shall learn the ways to answer an IELTS Agree Disagree question on the topic, ‘Many Old Buildings Protected by Law are Part of a Nation’s History’ to boost your mind mapping and organisation skills. Hop on!

Find out the best IELTS Writing Task 2 tips for achieving band 9 for the IELTS Writing Task 2 right before you check out the Agree/Disagree essay for ‘Many Old Buildings Protected by Law are Part of a Nation’s History’ given below!

IELTS Agree/Disagree Essay Question 

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by new ones. Do you agree or disagree?

You should write at least 250 words.

Structure Breakdown

IELTS Band 7 Sample Answer - Many Old Buildings Protected by Law are Part of a Nation’s History

Ancient buildings are relics of the past and should be preserved, in the view of some people. Others, however, believe that the appearance of modern buildings will open a new horizon for the development of a nation. My essay will discuss the validity of both sides.

The ancient houses are, first, believed to the reservoir of the glorious past of a nation. With their existence along each road, it is undeniable that no sooner does young generation grow up than they become proud of their country’s admirable old-day history through the image of roof, ceiling and walls. Philosophically speaking, like a person who clings to the past to reflect, views the present to enjoy and contemplates the future, a city itself entails an inextricable link of these three-time axes to revise, thrive and fly. Nevertheless, in case of derelict old houses, such experience of living in these shelters could be a nightmare to quite a few people, for instance, Hanoi people who are suffering a low-quality life in an ancient street. It is a common-scene to some that three to four households have only one toilet system with their wall painting layers bound to peel off and their ceilings sagging owing to weathering.

Another rationale is that these old houses are symbolic of the unique architecture and serve as a mental panacea for hurry-sickness city-dwellers. Hardly can the modern-day people recreate such beauties as that by famous architects of yesterdays who utilized the past materials, and for that reason, some streets adorned with second-to-none buildings are ideal destinations for the visitors world-wide to savour themselves in the sense of serene old days. To those who are sucking in a life of craze, the tiny old houses resemble oases to ease their stress. Opponents have their points in the belief that as a result of the explosion of population, so crowded do streets turn out that these old, unsafe and dirty houses should be demolished to give way to skyscrapers to accommodate an ever-increasing number of people who flock to the city in the hope of a better life. Also, not until the cities are paved with modern buildings and wide roads do investors from other continents pay greater attention, which, in turn, generates a huge amount of profit for the entire nation.

In the final analysis, each idea has its own reasoning, but in my opinion, the presence of old houses is essential to the survival of any city for their originality and unforgettable destinations of travel lovers.

IELTS Band 8 Sample Answer - Many Old Buildings Protected by Law are Part of a Nation’s History

Old buildings and architecture are an important part of a country’s cultural identity, but some individuals strongly believe they should be destroyed and replaced by modern constructions. While modern architecture is also important for urban development, I entirely disagree with the idea of replacing historic buildings, since they hold great cultural value while contributing to both educational and economic benefits.

To begin with, one of the most important reasons to preserve ancient buildings is their cultural and historical importance. Such buildings represent the traditions, culture,  beliefs, and craftsmanship of the previous generations, and help people understand their heritage. For example, the maintenance of the Tower of London allows people to learn all about Britain's medieval past and royal history. If these kinds of buildings were demolished, the future generation would lose a perfect connection to their ancestors and a good understanding of their country’s evolution. Hence, maintaining these historic sites helps people sustain their national pride and cultural continuity.

In addition to their cultural significance, ancient buildings contribute greatly to a country’s economy through tourism. Many of the cities, such as Paris and Italy, attract millions of tourists every year who come specifically to see their historic landmarks. This act not only generates income for local businesses, but also this creates enormous employment opportunities in the hospitality and tourism fields. Adding on, restoring old buildings can be more environmentally sustainable instead of constructing newer ones, since it reduces waste and saves resources.  

In conclusion, I firmly believe that older buildings should be protected at any cost rather than being replaced since they are the valuable symbols of a nation’s history, and their preservation brings important educational, and economic advantages. 

IELTS Band 9 Sample Answer - Many Old Buildings Protected by Law are Part of a Nation’s History

Every locality has certain places of interest which are preserved by the local or concerned authorities. These sites serve as a symbol of the culture followed by the communities in the region where they are situated. Although many believe that the protection of such establishments often hinders the ability to meet the rising demand for shelter, others feel that it is mandatory to safeguard these heritage sites. I strongly believe that old buildings and structures of a region should be protected and maintained rather than replacing them with modern establishments.

Firstly, it is important to understand the significance of these buildings in narrating the story of a certain area. Since these ancient structures are creations of our predecessors, they serve as a reminder of a simpler time. Secondly, these sites not only serve as a source of nostalgia and pride for the people of the local communities but they also help foreigners and tourists understand the history of the place. Also, structures like these serve as prime examples of immaculate architectural practices which can be implemented in modern times.

Furthermore, the idea of tearing down and replacing these cultural properties has several limitations which have to be taken into account. First of all, a majority of the antique buildings have sheltered generations of residing families and in some cases, more than one household is settled in such places. Thus, uprooting people from their ancestral homes to facilitate modern construction is a measure that is drastic in nature. Moreover, breaking down these structures and erecting new ones in their place involves tremendous expenses and might be considered unfeasible by the authorities.

However, issues like overpopulation have amplified the need for proper housing worldwide and this demand can only be met by creating new structures. Nevertheless, replacing culturally significant places with apartment buildings is not a productive remedy to this problem.

Finally, I would like to add that paying homage to our traditions and history is a necessary step to remind us of our roots. Therefore, protecting and nurturing notable landmarks should always be facilitated by the authorities and the general public.

Do not forget to proofread your essay for grammar, vocabulary, and spelling errors. These sample answers, combined with proper practice, will help you write well-structured and coherent IELTS Writing Task 2 Agree/Disagree essays like the ‘Many Old Buildings Protected by Law are Part of a Nation’s History!’

More Writing Task 2 Essay Topics

• Television Injects Violence In Children
• Some People Think That Teachers Should Be Responsible For Teaching Students
• Government I0nvestment In The Arts
• In Many Countries The Proportion Of Older Is Steadily Increasing
• Economic Growth Has Helped Many Become Richer

Other links check out:

• IELTS Writing Task 2
• IELTS Essay Topics
• Tips to write introduction in IELTS Writing Task 2
• Tips to write great writing essay
• IELTS Sample essays
• IELTS Writing task 2 Preparation Tips
• Tips to Improve IELTS Writing Skills
• How to get band 8 in IELTS Writing Task 2
• IELTS Writing recent actual test
• Direct question essay
• IELTS Band 9 essays
• Advantage and Disadvantage Essays
• IELTS Writing Answer sheet
• IELTS map vocabulary
• IELTS Writing Task 1 Connectors