IELTS Writing 2 Topic: Government Investment in the Arts
Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. To what extent do you agree with this statement? OR
Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
State your opinion clearly (whether you agree or disagree). Explain in brief what you are going to write in the body of your essay.
How to allocate fairly government’s budget for a variety of social demands from health care, infrastructure to other mental ones such as arts remains controversial. Some people insist on that that money should be earmarked more for public services and less for the arts, while others believe each area should receive an inequitable amount of spending for its unique value contributed to social development.
Paragraph 1: Admittedly, public services are not of immediate benefit for the entire society.
Paragraph 2: However, the need for arts is rising these days for their long-term worth, especially during the time the country is beyond the peak of economic development and gears itself towards sustainable growth.
Restate your opinion in clear and direct sentences.
Sample Essay 1
How to allocate fairly government’s budget for a variety of social demands from health care, infrastructure to other mental ones such as arts remains controversial. Some people insist on that that money should be earmarked more for public services and less for the arts, while others believe each area should receive an inequitable amount of spending for its unique value contributed to social development. I partly agree with the latter view for the following reasons.
Admittedly, public services are not of immediate benefit for the entire society. The issues of health care, education, and infrastructure are always top concerns of any government that wants to recruit high-skilled labour, a strong workforce, and modern facilities. Some countries still struggling with abject misery after wars, a large amount of spending for music and painting proves infeasible.
However, the need for arts is rising these days for their long-term worth, especially during the time the country is beyond the peak of economic development and gears itself towards sustainable growth. With music, painting and other kinds of arts gaining their popularity, people’s spiritual life is continuously enriched. Such cities say, Florence, Paris, and Madrid are always unforgettable destinations of millions of visitors for their spectacular artistic creations and lure them into a different world where people are away from worries and let their creativity take off. These cities are also homes to various well-known art geniuses from Picasso, Leona DeVinci to Gaudi, who led art revolutions, partly by dint of their governments’ greater appreciation of this field and bigger expenditure on it. America and Britain are, too, other examples of nations where the music industry overwhelms other key ones for their greatest generation of profit. This is again derived from their governments’ frequent organization of musical shows and festivals to attract audiences worldwide.
Sure, investing in public services is going to improve the infrastructure; however, investments in the arts and traditions will simply helps us improve the economy and GDP.
In a word, governments should pay more attention to key sectors when their nations are in the embryonic stage of growth, but once they escape the life of poverty, arts should have a bigger say for their mental, educational and economic merits.
Sample Essay 2
It is precisely understandable that governments must begin looking at varying ways to improve the public facilities for a sustainable development. Governments must make a true innovation in keeping the society stable, meaning that the citizens should get adequate services from the governments. As per the said statement, governments should use the money for public development and not for other things, such as theatre and music. On a personal note, I complete disagree with this statement. In the forthcoming paragraphs, I shall support my reasons.
These days, to deal with development as a country, governments must compete with other nations. Arts can contribute to the quality of life positively. I believe that every nation has its own abilities and skills that make it stand out from the rest of the world. For instance, we are witnessing some of the competitions held at a global level, where people take part from every corner of the globe, such as Miss Universe, Asian Idol, World Choir Competition, and more. Every nation sends the best participants to take part in these competitions. Competitors get to compete with an array of people, coming from varying backgrounds, nations and cultures.
Additionally, I think that in case a government invests money into the art sector, the country, as a whole, will get to relish a gamut of benefits. For instance, India has a lot of skillful, talented artisans, crafting enchanting and mesmerising decor pieces. India can sell these crafts on a global scale. This way, our talent and skills can become everlasting, creating unending opportunities for the artisans as well as the country. However, to make the most out of this global sale, people would have to establish a good teamwork with the government only then adequate outcome can be achieved.
Sure, investing in public services can improve our infrastructure-game; however, paying major attention to only this factor will not reap any benefits. Hence, arts and theater should get the deserving attention as well.
Concluding this essay, I would like to say that governments should begin investing the funds to enhance art creation as it has bigger opportunities to make a country extremely successful.
Band 9 Sample Essay
There are various areas of government expenditure that suffer from a lack of substantial monetary investment. In situations like these, sensible resource management must be followed by the administration to allocate necessary funds to the sectors in need. It is widely believed that public facilities and infrastructure should be given more priority instead of fine arts when it comes to the utilization of government resources. I am a strong supporter of this belief as urban services serve a more crucial purpose than artistic agencies.
A considerable proportion of the population is greatly dependent on government-provided services. These amenities are a crucial aid to the smooth functioning of an ordinary citizen’s life. Furthermore, the dependence on such facilities is more prevalent in third-world countries like India, Brazil, and China, where the general income of a majority of the populace makes private services unaffordable. Thus, bearing in mind the necessities of the people on a macro-level, the public-sector merits extensive financial backing.
Additionally, we must also address the fact that creative activities like drama and music are only possible when the basic needs are adequately fulfilled. If there is a deficiency in the physical and mental well-being of an individual, no matter how impressive the artwork is, it will fail to ignite any stimulus within that person. Thus, it is vital to enhance the standard of living of the population before refining the quality of arts, as artistic demands are always secondary to rudimentary needs.
Nevertheless, the value of creative work cannot be disregarded entirely as all the artforms collectively form an industry that is vital to the economy. However, this trade has the support of numerous wealthy individuals and organizations, thereby do not require much assistance from the government.
Finally, the framework of government services requires fiscal reform. Thus, the authorities should recognize these obligations and concentrate their resources on the public sector.
Meaning: (verb) to decide to use something for a specific reason.
Eg: The government should allocate their budget for arts.
Meaning: (adjective) causing public disagreement.
Eg: The politics has always been a controversial issue.
Meaning: (verb) to choose somebody.
Eg: Vedant has been earmarked as the next HOD.
Meaning: (adjective) unfair.
Eg: The government’s behaviour is inequitable for some sectors.
Meaning: (adverb) to be admitted.
Eg: Admittedly, this is the best trip of my life.
Meaning: (adjective) without hope.
Eg: I abject failure.
Meaning: (adjective) impracticable
Eg: Walking this far is infeasible for me.
Meaning: (noun) a point where something is at the highest.
Eg: I am at the peak of my career.
Meaning: (verb) to enhance the quality
Eg: The almonds are enriched with required nutrients.
Meaning: (verb) to get something from something.
Eg: I derive satisfaction from my work.
More Writing Task 2 Essay Topics
- In Many Countries The Proportion Of Older Is Steadily Increasing
- Economic Growth Has Helped Many Become Richer
- Today’s Fresh Food Like Vegetables Or Fruits Travels Thousands Of Miles
- Girls Tend To Choose Arts While Boys Like Science
- It Is Better For College Students To Live In Schools Than Live At Home With Their Parents
- Many Students Have To Study Subjects Which They Do Not Like
- IELTS Writing Task 2
- IELTS Essay Topics
- Tips to write introduction in IELTS Writing Task 2
- Tips to write great writing essay
- IELTS Sample essays
- IELTS Writing task 2 Tips
- IELTS Writing tips
- How to get band 8 in IELTS Writing Task 2
- IELTS Writing recent actual test
- Direct question essay
- IELTS Band 9 essays
- Advantage and Disadvantage Essays
- IELTS Writing Answer sheet
- IELTS map vocabulary
- IELTS Writing Task 1 Connectors
Post your Comments
Posted on May 23, 2022
Government expenditures are rising every single day. Some people claim that governments oblige to spend money on public goods rather than on arts. Even though a plethora of reasons can be given for unjustified this, I strongly agree that putting money on arts is just a waste of economic resources. In order to explain my opinion, I will provide some details in the next couple of paragraphs.
As it is well known, our resources are scarce. Thus, states must be extremely careful when they make decisions regarding financial issues. The focus of the governments should be on public services such as education and health because these services have a vital role in building a better society. Without these services, it would only be a daydream to live in a prosperous country. For instance, Germany as a leading European country does not invest in unnecessary fields such as arts.
Moreover, the priority of the governments is to remain in power as much as possible. For instance, governments mostly prefer to invest in infrastructures, municipalities, and construction works to continue to rule the people. Therefore, governments have to be strategic about where to put the money on. After the 2008 global financial crisis, politicians are becoming more decisive about the state budgets. For this reason, the questions of where and how to spend the money become more and more critical.
However, some people claim that government should not cut their budget on arts.
To sum up, if governments aim to stay in power, they have to use the money for public services. I strongly agree that other expenditures rather than public services should be cut by the Ministry of Economics.
Posted on May 24, 2022
Thank you so much for your help!
Posted on May 24, 2022
Band Score – 6
Concentrate on the correct usage of articles, subject-verb agreement, prepositions and punctuation.
Discuss the contrasting viewpoint in 2-3 sentences to give a better understanding.
Use C2 level of words.