Solving Environment Problems Should be the Responsibility of an International Organization – IELTS Writing Task 2

One of the recent IELTS topics in Writing Task 2, ‘Solving environment problems should be the responsibility of an international organization’, reflects the debate about who should take the responsibility for handling and solving environmental issues. The two most common contenders for these duties are an international environmental body and the national governments. To write a high-scoring essay on this topic, you should not only know the structure of the agree-disagree essay but also master the art of expressing your opinion with clarity and coherence.

In this article, we examine sample answers for the IELTS agree/disagree essay on the topic ‘Solving Environment Problems Should be the Responsibility of an International Organization’, along with an outline and relevant IELTS vocabulary, which is crucial for achieving a high band score.

Essay Question for ‘Solving Environment Problems Should be the Responsibility of an International Organization’

Outline for IELTS Agree and Disagree Essay

Below is an outline to help you understand how to write agree and disagree essays in IELTS.

Sample Answers for Solving Environment Problems Should be the Responsibility of an International Organization IELTS Writing Task 2

Here are some sample essays, including an IELTS Band 9 essay sample, that address the topic of Solving Environment Problems Should be the Responsibility of an International Organization' in IELTS Writing Task 2. 

Solving Environment Problems Should be the Responsibility of an International Organization - Sample Answer 1

Environmental problems such as climate change and pollution have escalated beyond national boundaries. As a result, while some people feel that an international organization should be held responsible, others support that it should be addressed by individual national governments. I strongly agree that international organisations should take the primary responsibility for addressing these issues because environmental challenges are inherently global and demand coordinated, large-scale action.

Firstly, many environmental problems, including global warming and air pollution, cannot be contained within one country’s borders. For instance, carbon emissions from industrialised nations contribute to atmospheric degradation that affects the entire planet, not just the source country. Therefore, international organisations such as the United Nations and the World Health Organization can ensure fair global cooperation and uniform environmental regulations. This unified framework promotes accountability and prevents countries from neglecting their ecological obligations in pursuit of economic gain.

Secondly, international organisations possess the expertise, resources, and technology necessary to manage large-scale environmental crises. The Paris Climate Agreement, facilitated by the United Nations, is a clear example of global solidarity in combating climate change. It allows wealthier nations to provide funding and technological assistance to developing countries, enabling them to adopt sustainable practices. Such collective mechanisms ensure that all nations, regardless of their financial capacity, can contribute meaningfully to global sustainability goals. Without central coordination, efforts would likely remain fragmented and ineffective.

In conclusion, since environmental challenges transcend national boundaries, international organisations must take the lead in designing and enforcing global environmental policies. Only through shared responsibility, transparency, and long-term cooperation can humanity achieve ecological balance and safeguard the planet for future generations.

Solving Environment Problems Should be the Responsibility of an International Organization - Sample Answer 2

There is no doubt that environment-related issues ought to be held responsible for by an international organization instead of individual countries. I disagree with this statement for some reasons.

There are numerous environmental issues such as climate change, melting glaciers and intensifying greenhouse effect happening on a global scale. As the argument goes, an international organization would act as a leader, issuing principles for all member countries to conform to or it will have sufficient financial capabilities to support the improvement of the environment. Cited cases are the Kyoto protocol has contributed to the slowing down of climate change on the earth, or the United Nations’ support for Third World countries have helped improve the air quality there. This argument, however, fails to take into consideration the fact that compulsion often backfires if an individual nation has no intention to cooperate, or the incentives provided can make recipient countries over reliant and avoid coming up with innovative ideas to resolve their country’s environmental situation. This in the long term exerts a negative overall global effect.

I side with those who think that each governmental body should take responsibility for addressing domestic environmental problems. Firstly, this practice would have a chain effect, benefiting not only the host country but also neighboring nations. For instance, if China diminishes its emissions by downsizing its industrial activities to a certain acceptable level, the air contamination in Hanoi would be reduced as a consequence. Secondly, the root of a complete resolution of environmental issues comes at grassroots level, only achieved by the efforts of a country’s government. If walking or cycling are promoted amongst those with an inclination to use private vehicles, this can help diminish the colossal volumes of exhaust gas, and ameliorate the communal air quality. Or, if people are encouraged to participate in the international Earth Hour when everyone is asked to turn their lights off in sixty minutes, huge amounts of power can be minimized. Enacting such events which are aimed at creating a mindset shift in the public regarding environmental protection and promoting a simple lifestyle can only be conducted by a country’s government.

In conclusion, uprooting environment problems should be the responsibility of each national government rather than an international organization.

Check out the IELTS Writing Actual Test in August 2017 with Sample Answers for more model answers on a related essay topic to ‘Solving Environment Problems Should be the Responsibility of an International Organization – IELTS Writing Task 2’.

 Vocabulary to Use for Solving Environment Problems Should be the Responsibility of an International Organization - IELTS Writing Task 2

Here is a list of vocabulary for IELTS essay (Writing Task 2), related to the topic ‘Solving Environment Problems Should be the Responsibility of an International Organization, as used in the example answers.

To conclude, the topic ‘Solving Environment Problems Should be the Responsibility of an International Organization – IELTS Writing Task 2’ tests your ability to argue clearly for global vs. national environmental responsibility, use specific examples and apply advanced environmental vocabulary accurately. So, maintain a clear position, use cohesive arguments, and integrate topic-specific lexis effectively throughout your essay to score an IELTS band score of 7 or higher. 

Useful Links:

• The Best Way to Solve the World’s Environmental Problems is to Increase the Cost of Fuel - IELTS Writing Task 2
• Managing Global Environmental Issues Should be Handled- IELTS Writing Task 2
• Environmental Problems Are Too Big To Be Managed By Individual Person Or Individual Country- IELTS Writing 2
• Useful Phrases & Expressions About Environment: Advanced Vocabulary for IELTS Speaking
• Collocations for IELTS Writing Task 2 Topic: Environment
• Achieving Precision in IELTS Writing Vocabulary